Monday, April 30, 2012
Tetris Helps To Reduce Trauma
Tetris 'helps to reduce trauma'
Study subjects who played the computer game had fewer 'flashbacks'
Playing the computer puzzle game Tetris can help reduce the effects of traumatic stress, UK researchers say.
Volunteers were exposed to distressing images, with some given the game to play 30 minutes later, the PLoS One journal reported.
Players had fewer "flashbacks", perhaps because it helped disrupt the laying down of memories, said the scientists.
It is hoped the study could aid the development of new strategies for minimising the impact of trauma.
However, the researchers accept translating their findings into practical applications could prove difficult.
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), often associated with experiences during conflict, can affect anyone who has suffered a sudden and shocking incident.
One of its main features is the "flashback", in which the distressing sights, sounds or smells of the incident can return in everyday life.
Tetris may work by competing for the brain's resources for sensory information
Dr Emily Holmes
Oxford University
The Oxford University experiment works on the principle that it may be possible to modify the way in which the brain forms memories in the hours after an event.
A total of 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled, and shown a film which included traumatic images of injuries.
Half of the group were then given the game to play while the other half did nothing.
The number of "flashbacks" experienced by each group was then reported and recorded over the next week, and those who played Tetris had significantly fewer.
Treatment hope
Dr Emily Holmes said it might produce a "viable approach" to PTSD treatment, although she acknowledged that a lot needed to be done to translate the experiment into something that could be used to help real patients.
She said: "We wanted to find a way to dampen down flashbacks - the raw sensory images of trauma that are over-represented in the memories of those with PTSD.
"Tetris may work by competing for the brain's resources for sensory information.
"We suggest it specifically interferes with the way sensory memories are laid down in the period after trauma and thus reduces the number of flashbacks that are experienced afterwards."
She stressed that no conclusions could be drawn on the general effects of computer gaming on memory.
Dr Holmes added: "We are not saying that people with PTSD should play Tetris but we do think it is hugely valuable to understand how the brain works and how it produces intrusive flashback memories.
"Because we cannot study the genesis of real flashback memories during real trauma we need to find other approaches and this sort of cognitive science can give us models to help us better understand emotional memory."
Professor David Alexander from the Aberdeen Centre for Trauma Research stressed it was ethically impossible to simulate an event so catastrophic as the type of incident which can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder.
"The volunteers here knew that something was going to happen, but they were not going to be harmed - a genuinely traumatic incident is different in scale, and is usually completely unexpected and marked by feelings of loss of control."
He said that post-traumatic stress was normally detected and diagnosed only weeks after the event, rather than in the hours immediately afterwards, and it was very difficult to predict which people were likely to develop it.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Glitter Bombs!
Sunday Humor: Air Force Starts Using Highly Effective ‘Glitter Bomb’ Against Taliban

Colonel Stanley Roberts, a representative for the Air Force, explained what the bomb does over a phone interview.
“The glitter bomb has been used effectively on a smaller scale basis for years. Even Newt Gingrich got a face full of one. We simply adapted this weapon to use on a much larger scale. It’s an airburst weapon, meaning it doesn’t hit the ground and impact, but explodes over head of the enemy. Once the bomb detonates, an area of approximately one square mile is coated in glitter.”
But why glitter?, we asked.
COL Roberts responded, “Honestly, I can’t think of anything more annoying than this type of warfare. It’s been extremely effective in every engagement. In each case, the Taliban fighters immediately committed suicide once hit with the MX784. Everyone hates glitter, well, except for the gays and Ke$ha. The main drawback is that the affected area has to be treated like a radioactive site, because that glitter is never coming off. ”
While not prohibited under the Geneva Conventions, the Taliban has spoken out against the US saying the use of this weapon is a violation of human rights. Maktadar Al-Sabib, a spokesman for the Taliban, spoke in a video released to the web:
“This is an absolute affront to humanity. This type of weapon cannot be allowed! It is not surprising that the barbarian Americans developed such a sinister device to use upon Allah’s people. My poor friends Ahmad and Abdullah both had glitter covered beards and man-jammies. Our revenge will be swift and just!”
When asked about her view on the subject, Ke$ha was all for the use of the MX784. “I love glitter, and I think this is a great way to spread democracy to Afghanistan. Maybe everyone will learn to party and the war can end sooner rather than later.”
The gays declined to comment.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Al Qaeda Essentially Gone
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/28/year-after-seal-raid-that-killed-bin-laden-core-al-qaeda-essentially-gone-but/?test=latestnews#ixzz1tMfF4Zld
Made In USA
I am a White, Conservative, Tax-Paying, American Veteran, Gun Owning Biker.
That's me!
I am a Master Mason. I work hard and long hours with my hands to earn a living.
I believe in God and the freedom of religion, but I don't push it on others.
I ride Harley Davidson Motorcycles, and drive American-made cars, and I believe in American products and buy them whenever I can.
I believe the money I make belongs to me and not some liberal governmental functionary, Democratic or Republican, that wants to share it with others who don't work!
I'm in touch with my feelings and I like it that way!
I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer; it makes you a smart American.
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized, and does not entitle you to Anything. Get over it!
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac or any other item, you should do it in English.
I believe there should be no other language option.
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.
My heroes are Malcolm Forbes, Bill Gates, John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and
Willie G. Davidson, who makes the awesome Harley Davidson Motorcycles.
I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor.
I know wrestling is fake and I don't waste my time watching or arguing about it.
I've never owned a slave, nor was I a slave. I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted By the Turks, and neither have you!
I believe if you don't like the way things are here, go back to where you came from and Change your own country!
This is AMERICA ...We like it the way it is and more so the way it was ...so stop trying to Change it to look like Russia or China , or some other socialist country!
If you were born here and don't like it... You are free to move to any Socialist country that will Have you. I believe it is time to really clean house, starting with the Washington D.C. , the seat Of our biggest problems.
I want to know which church is it, exactly, where the Reverend Jesse Jackson preaches, Where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution?
Can I get an AMEN on that one?
I also think the cops have the right to pull you over if you're breaking the law, regardless of What color you are, but not just because you happen to ride a bike.
And, no, I don't mind having my face shown on my driver's license. I think
it's good....
And I'm proud that 'God' is written on my money..
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, I don't want you deciding who Should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me stuff or trying to guilt me Into making 'donations' to their cause.... Get a job and do your part to support yourself and Your family!
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents....
I believe 'illegal' is illegal no matter what the lawyers think!
I believe the American flag should be the only one allowed in AMERICA !
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I'm a BAD American.
If you are a BAD American too, please forward this to everyone you know...
We want our country back!
My Country..... I hope this offends all illegal aliens.
My great, great, great, great grandfather watched and bled as his friends
died in the Revolution & the War of 1812.
My great, great, great grandfather watched as his friends died in the
Mexican American War.
My great, great grandfather watched as his friends & brothers died in the
Civil War.
My great grandfather watched as his friends died in the Spanish-American
War.
My grandfather watched as his friends died in WW I.
My father watched as his friends died in WW II.
I watched as my friends died in Vietnam , Panama & Desert Storm.
My son watched & bled as his friends died in Afghanistan and Iraq .
None of them died for the Mexican Flag.
Everyone died for the American flag.
Texas high school students raised a Mexican flag on a school flag pole, other students took it down. Guess who was expelled...the students who took it down.
California high school students were sent home on Cinco de Mayo, because they wore T-shirts with the American flag printed on them.
Enough is enough
This message needs to be viewed by every American; and every American needs to stand up for America .
We've bent over to appease the America-haters long enough. I'm taking a stand.
I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died fighting in wars for this country, and for the American flag.
If you agree, stand up with me. If you disagree, please let me know. I will gladly not forward things of this order.
And shame on anyone who tries to make this a racist message.
AMERICANS, stop giving away Your RIGHTS !
Let me make this clear! THIS IS MY COUNTRY !
This statement DOES NOT mean I'm against immigration !
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE, IN MY COUNTRY, welcome to come legally:
1. Get a sponsor !
2. Learn the LANGUAGE, as immigrants have in the past !
3. Live by OUR rules !
4. Get a job !
5. Pay YOUR Taxes !
6. No Social Security until you have earned it and Paid for it !
7. NOW find a place to lay your head !
If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone, then YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM !
We've gone so far the other way . . . bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
Only AMERICANS seems to care when American Citizens are being offended !
WAKE UP America ! ! !
If you do not Pass this on, may your fingers cramp !
Made in the U S A & PROUD OF IT!!!!!
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Arizona Immigration Law In Supreme Court
Published April 25, 2012
FoxNews.com
Immigration fight heads to highest court The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.
The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.
The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.
"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.
Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."
While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.
"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."
But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.
"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.
The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.
The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.
Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.
"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.
But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.
"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.
The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.
Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.
A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.
The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.
Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.
"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.
But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime." The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/25/arizona-immigration-law-battle-arrives-at-supreme-court/#ixzz1t4nZYLr7
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Illegal Immigration News
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
KRIS KOBACH: IMMIGRATION NOT JUST A FEDERAL MATTER
Reuters’ Terry Baynes recently interviewed Kansas secretary of state Kris Kobach about the issue of state versus federal authority in immigration matters given the battle in the U.S. Supreme Court next week, when the court will hear arguments for and against new Arizona laws against illegal immigration.
As Kobach points out in the interview, the federal government has primary authority over immigration but “the Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that states have spheres of activity where they can operate to discourage illegal immigration. It’s an area of shared authority.” Kobach then went on to explain that the Obama administration’s argument that federal immigration law is “not designed to ferret out every person unlawfully present in the United States” is false and that the law as written by Congress is very clear and uncompromising. Kobach says, “It calls for enforcement across the board” and that the Obama administration is choosing not to enforce the laws with which it disagrees.
TEXAS MINOR CHARGED WITH 9 COUNTS OF MURDER IN CRASH OF SMUGGLING VAN
A 15-year-old South Texas boy has been charged with nine counts of murder after nine illegal immigrants being smuggled into the United States were killed when he crashed a minivan. The boy was also charged with 17 counts of smuggling a person causing serious bodily injury or death, and one count of evading following last week’s fatal encounter with Border Patrol officers.
The accident only occurred when the boy, who was driving the van, sped off after being pulled over by Border Patrol agents and crashed just a few blocks away. The boy fled on foot, but was arrested two days later at his home. Six people suspected of involvement in the smuggling operation have been arrested on charges related to harboring illegal immigrants and at least four of the six crash survivors were detained as material witnesses, after which they will likely be given a special visa to remain legally in the United States.
A judge will eventually decide whether the boy will be tried as an adult as is hoped by Hidalgo County District Attorney Rene Guerra.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Illegal Immigration News
Monday, April 16, 2012
CLUB FED’S FUTURE JEOPARDIZED OVER PRIVATE CONTRACTOR USE
Amnesty advocates are getting even more creative when it comes to fighting the enforcement of immigration law, but now it may have turned the battle over an elaborate and outrageously expensive 800-bed illegal immigrant detention center in our favor – at least for now.
Seeing that the usual tactics weren’t working, Chicago’s immigrant rights advocates joined local opposition and successfully persuaded the Democratic leaders of Illinois to try banning Crete, Ill. – where the detention facility is to be built – from working with private contractors on the project.
The proposed ban amends an existing policy prohibiting the state and municipalities from using private companies to run prisons to also include detention centers. It cleared the Illinois Senate and could come up for a House vote this week. Gov. Pat Quinn, an ardent support of pro-illegal immigrant legislation – has already hinted at his support.
OBAMA’S ILLEGAL-IMMIGRANT UNCLE FIGHTING DEPORTATION
Drunk-driving Uncle Omar – Barack Obama’s illegal immigrant uncle – may never be deported.
Immigration experts are predicting that 67-year-old Onyango Obama, who nearly crashed into a police cruiser while barreling though an intersection with a blood alcohol content of .14 in August 2011, will appeal the 20-year-old deportation order and apply for asylum on the grounds that the Kenyan embassy was bombed by al-Qaeda in 1998 and that hostility toward the U.S. would put him in danger.
Reportedly, hundreds of Obamas relatives live in western Kenya without a problem though the same logic was used to halt the deportation of Obama’s illegal immigrant aunt, Zeituni, in 2008 who continues to live in public housing and collect $700 in monthly disability checks.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Friday, April 13, 2012
Sheriff Joe Under Seige
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is under siege by the Obama administration.
Obama has joined forces with George Soros and “La Raza” – not to mention the ENTIRE Leftwing liberal political establishment – in a multi-million dollar smear campaign to DESTROY AND DISCREDIT Sheriff Joe, “America’s Toughest Sheriff” solely for doing his job and doing it well.
And to top it all off, they are spending millions of YOUR tax dollars to do it!
Already, federal bureaucrats handpicked by this administration are working as “monitors” in Sheriff Joe’s Maricopa County office to stop him from enforcing immigration law.
More than anything else, the Spender-in-Chief wants to stop Sheriff Joe from continuing the Cold Case Posse investigation of his Constitutional eligibility to be President – an investigation which has already unearthed ‘probable cause’ and evidence of a systemic effort to cover-up and conceal information surrounding Barack Hussein Obama’s alleged citizenship.
Radical amnesty fanatics just held a protest demanding that the federal government step in and strip Sheriff Joe of his badge – Obama’s buddy George Soros even pledged $10 million to defeat Sheriff Joe for reelection!
We know Obama’s utter failure to reign in HIS out-of-control spending has left you broke as gas prices continue to soar right along with the cost of groceries. And let’s not forget, many of us will be forking over OUR hard-earned dollars to Uncle Sam this coming Tuesday to pay for Obama’s nanny-state and welfare for the 12 million illegal immigrants whose fraudulent votes he’s depending on for reelection.
Time and time again YOU have rallied to defeat illegal immigration by fighting to secure our borders and defeat backdoor amnesty. You have supported patriots running for office and held them accountable for sticking to their guns when it comes enforcing our immigration laws. Now, we're asking you to rally for Sheriff Joe.
Make no mistake: Your decision to support Sheriff Joe WILL determine whether he wins or loses the upcoming re-election for Sheriff.
We know you are broke. Obama has made sure of that. We know you are sick and tired of the career politicians reciting pretty speeches about securing the borders only to turn a blind-eye once they had your vote.
But Sheriff Joe is no career politician, and unlike Barack Hussein Obama, Sheriff Joe listens to the AMERICAN people – U.S. Citizens, the folks, you and me.
Sheriff Joe is “public enemy number one” to this administration and Hypocrite Holder’s U.S. Justice Department – because he refuses to watch illegal immigration destroy our country, and despite the White House’s relentless pressure and smear campaigns against him, Sheriff Joe has not and will not back down.
Sheriff Joe is in the fight of his life, and he’s fighting it for us.
Now, we must fight for him.
Barack Obama and the Department of Justice are bringing lawsuit after lawsuit against America’s Toughest Sheriff. They’ve conspired to place Sheriff Joe’s office in a type of federal “receivership” – essentially stripping Sheriff Joe of his power and flooding his office with Obama’s mindless minions straight from bureaucratic Washington – all so they can stop Sheriff Joe’s crackdown on illegal immigration in its tracks! Obama’s public relations team has even touted their efforts against Sheriff Joes as ones made to protect the ‘civil rights’ of illegal immigrants.
Sheriff Joe needs your help, and he needs it now. Please, make the most generous contribution you can possibly afford to defend Sheriff Joe from Obama’s vindictive smear machine! Millions of dollars of warped, hate-filled ads are going to bombard Maricopa County as the Leftwing prepares to do whatever it takes to defeat Sheriff Joe.
We need to be able to fight back with ads of our own. We need to be able to stand alongside Sheriff Joe and take down this administration once and for all.
NO ONE in the mainstream media is reporting the White House’s behind-the-scenes battle preparations as they ready for the most high-stakes election – an election of unparalleled importance when it comes to battling illegal immigration. You see, Maricopa County Arizona is THE busiest drug- and human-trafficking corridor along the U.S.-Mexico border. If we can stem the flow of illegal immigration there, and continue enforcing the zero-tolerance policy when it comes to illegal immigration, we have taken back the upperhand and we have a chance to take back our country.
Sheriff Joe and his fellow officers are our only hope to secure the border and enforce OUR laws – not Mexico’s, not the United Nations’, and certainly not Obama’s warped interpretation of them – but the ones written in the books that declare those who illegally enter our country to be CRIMINALS to be deported back to their home countries, not given access to our taxpayer funded public services or snuck into the voting booths to bolster Obama’s radical agenda. And certainly not rewarded with amnesty at the expense of our future!
Sheriff Joe has made enemies of the most selfish person in the country – a person that has unlimited resources – and you better believe, Barack Obama has everything to lose if Sheriff Joe wins reelection.
Already, in the near two years of just some of Arizona’s no-nonsense immigration laws being enforced by Sheriff Joe’s office, Americans are filling the jobs once held by illegal immigrants and the burden on public resources has dropped as illegal immigrants flee either south of the border or to neighboring sanctuary states where there are no Sheriff Joes dedicated to standing up for the American people.
Sheriff Joe is a hero. Never doubt that.
But instead of being treated like the America-loving Patriot that he is, and applauded for doing his job and enforcing the law, he is being subjected to the most vicious liberal smear campaign paid for with your tax dollars and Soros’ pocket-change.
We know an Obama gallon of gas is more than $5/gallon in many places and that food prices are rising. Don't be fooled into thinking this is a local election about local needs. We need to keep Sheriff Joe in office not just for the security of Maricopa County but for the ENTIRE United States of America. Every aspect of our future – our children and our grandchildren’s future – depends on bringing Barack Hussein Obama down, and Sheriff Joe is the man for the job.
Sheriff Joe has risked EVERYTHING to stand up for us. We MUST stand up for him!
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Illegal Immigration News
Thursday, April 12, 2012
NINE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS DIE IN TEXAS WRECK
Eight survivors are now in the custody of immigration authorities following a Texas wreck that killed nine suspected illegal immigrants in McAllen, Texas. The fatal wreck happened after Border Patrol agents stopped the van and some of the passengers immediately sprinted away. As the foot chase unfolded, with one eventually caught, the van sped off and wrecked three or four blocks away with backpacks, water bottles and nine bodies scattered nearby.
The eight-passenger van had been gutted to accommodate all of the passengers on their journey into the U.S. causing the nine deaths as passengers without seatbelts were flung to their deaths as the van rolled. Most of those involved in the crash were from Mexico, including all of those who died.
LITIGATION-LOVING OBAMA WILL NOT USE DOJ TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW
Earlier this week, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle outright refused to hold illegal immigrants for Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the Cook County Jail saying it violates their civil rights.
On average, one hundred illegal immigrants are jailed in Cook County, post bail and are released every month.
The Obama administration has thus far refused to take any legal action against the county.
In November 2011, the Department of Justice sued the state of Utah over the implementation of their new immigration enforcement law which allows police officers to investigate suspects’ legal status in this country.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Allen West Claims Some Dems In Communist Party
Rep. Allen West (R-Fla) gave a characteristically energetic speech at a town hall event Tuesday evening, where he estimated that around 80 U.S. Representatives are Communist Party members.
After one person asked him about “card-carrying” Marxists in Congress, West responded to those who brushed aside the query.
“No, it’s a good question,” he said, adding: “I believe there is about 78 to 81 members of the Democratic Party that are members of the Communist Party.”
The Palm Beach Post hedged that a little by saying West said he’s “heard” that many are Communists. You can listen for yourself below:
West’s camp, however, isn’t backing down from the statement.
A spokeswoman for West, Angela Melvin, told the Washington Post that West was referring to the 76 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
“The Communist Party has publicly referred to the Progressive Caucus as its allies,” Melvin said. “The Progressive Caucus speaks for itself. These individuals certainly aren’t proponents of free markets or individual economic freedom.”
And campaign manager Tim Edson echoed that sentiment.
“He stands by the comments,” Edson told WaPo. “Call them what you want; they’re clearly people who oppose capitalism and free markets and individual economic freedom. So, if the shot fits.”
He did, however, clarify once pushed on whether the members West was referring to were actually Communist Party members:
We can quibble about the terminology used to describe them, but it’s clear. Whatever you call people that oppose capitalism and free markets and individual economic freedom — maybe it’s ‘socialist,’ maybe it’s ’Communist’ — but that’s the point the congressman was making, and he stands by the words.
Without identifying by name the 80 in question, West went on to attack President Obama as being too “scared” to have a public debate with him. The president was in Florida at the time, attending campaign events and speaking on the economy.
The Palm Beach Post reports West’s statements:
‘I really wish that, standing here before you, was Allen West and President Obama,’ West said. ‘We could have a simple discussion. But that ain’t ever gonna happen.’
‘Why not?’ an audience member asked.
‘Cuz he was too scared!’ West responded in a mocking voice.
A Tea Party favorite, Allen West is known for his fiery language. He is well-remembered for telling President Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi to take their message of economic dependency and enslaving the entrepreneurial will of the American people “the hell out of the United States America” back in January.
West’s political opponent Patrick Murphy responded to West’s comments: “The bottom line is, Allen West is trying to make it in the press with comments that don’t even make sense…He’s trying to make headlines, get a rise out of people and not get anything done.”
Retiring Rep. Barney Frank, a member of the Progressive Caucus, also fired back.
“Not even Joe McCarthy would have said anything so stupid and dissociated from reality,” Frank told The Huffington Post. “It’s an indication of the significant deterioration of the Republican Party as a responsible entity that an ignorant, mean guy like Allen West is considered one of their stars.”
Illegal Immigration News
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
CHICAGO – BOARD PRESIDENT REFUSES TO DETAIN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
Chicago-Board President Toni Preckwinkle outright refused to comply with federal immigration laws saying that she would not keep Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainers despite repeated requests from Washington to do so. Every month, about 100 illegal immigrants are arrested for crimes and put in Cook County Jail, where they often bond out and disappear.
Preckwinkle justifies her blatant disregard for the law saying that Cook County will not help in the deportation process, because that would mean granting [illegal immigrants] fewer rights than American citizens. Preckwinkle said, “The last frontier is how we treat the undocumented in this country,” claiming this is a civil rights issue rather than one of public safety.
FEDS TRY TO MAKE BORDER LESS ENTICING TO CROSS
Since last year, the federal government has been using Mexican and Central American television and radio stations and newspapers to warn locals of the dangers of illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, including assault, murder and the fact that women are often raped.
Now, the federal government is expanding the program to U.S. cities with large immigrant communities, including Los Angeles, Phoenix, Chicago, Seattle and Atlanta hoping that current illegal immigrants will discourage family members back home from making the treacherous and illegal crossing into this country.
Religion 'Not Driving Violence' In Nigeria
Posted on April 11, 2012 at 8:11am by Billy Hallowell
The radical Islamist group known as Boko Haram has killed more than 390 people in Nigeria this year, alone. The Associated Press reports that the group has slaughtered Christians, Muslims and foreigners.
Yet, just days after an Easter-day attack during which more than 40 Christian church-goers were killed, an Obama administration official made the allegation that “religion is not driving extreme violence” in Nigeria.
“I want to take this opportunity to stress one key point and that is that religion is not driving extremist violence either in Jos or northern Nigeria,” proclaimed Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson on Monday. “While some seek to inflame Muslim-Christian tensions, Nigeria’s ethnic and religious diversity, like our own in this country, is a source of strength, not weakness and there are many examples across Nigeria of communities working across religious lines to protect one another.”
Carson was speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. at a forum on U.S. policy toward Nigeria. CNS News has more about his address:
As CNSNews.com previously reported, Boko Haram, whose name translated into “Western education is forbidden,” has links to al-Qaeda’s North Africa affiliate, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, and has repeatedly vowed to cleanse northern Nigeria of minority Christians, and is responsible for more than 1,000 deaths since mid-2009.
Carson spoke at length about the terrorist group, saying Boko Haram “capitalizes on popular frustrations with the nation’s leaders,” and “seeks to humiliate and undermine the government and to exploit religious differences in order to create chaos and to make Nigeria ungovernable.” [...]
“Boko Haram’s attacks on churches and mosques are particularly disturbing because they are intended to inflame religious tensions and upset the nation’s social cohesion, although Boko Haram is reviled throughout Nigeria and offers no practical solutions to the country’s problems,” Carson said.
The Obama administration official maintains that the terrorist group is not a “monolithic, homogeneous organization.” It is a large body with a primary focus of discrediting the Nigerian government, he explains. Still, considering the past violence being used in the region, it’s hard to digest the notion that religion — particularly when considering the Christian individuals who are targeted — isn’t driving the horrific issues present in the nation.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Think It Can't Happen Here?
When nations and cultures ignore the early warning signs of the infiltration of radical Islam, they pay a very dear price. The UK has 85 sharia courts. France has over 750 “no go zones,” Muslim enclaves where even French police don’t enter.
Now the latest—a video of what is happening in Belgium.
We’re sure most people in Belgium never believed this could happen in their country. The path of least resistance for us Americans is to assume this could never happen here. But it already is. Just ask the Pennsylvania man who dressed up as a “zombie Mohammed” in a Halloween parade and was assaulted by a Muslim. To add insult to injury, a judge lectured the man who marched in the parade—calling him insensitive—and, astonishingly, dismissed the charges against the Muslim.
Someone must repeatedly sound the warning for America. That is the mission of ACT! for America. What can you do today to be part of our “early warning system?”
Illegal Immigration News
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
OBAMA PLANNING TO SUE SHERIFF JOE FOR ENFORCING THE LAW
The Obama administration said yesterday that it was preparing to sue Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his department for racial-profiling violating civil rights laws by improperly targeting Latinos when enforcing immigration law. Obama’s Justice Department claims that officers made unlawful stops and arrests of Latinos, used excessive force against them and failed to adequately protect the Hispanic community in Maricopa County.
Sheriff Joe and his department have firmly stood their ground against the Obama administration’s barrage of attacks that coincidentally (or not) escalated when America’s toughest sheriff announced his plans to open the first-ever criminal investigation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to appear on this fall’s presidential ballots.
TEXAS STATE REP. WANTS MEXICO TO REIMBURSE U.S. TAXPAYERS
Texas State Rep. Lyle Larson wrote in a March 21 letter that his state spends anywhere from $6 billion to $8 billion a year on health care and other costs for illegal immigrants – and he wants Mexican President Felipe Calderon to pay for it. Larson filed a bill during the 2011 legislative session that would have required state agencies and organizations to track the services they provide immigrants (and the expenses incurred) in order to figure out the illegal immigration problem from an “economic viewpoint.”
Amnesty advocates argue that illegal immigrants pay property and sales taxes – one study even suggested they pay more in state taxes than they cost the state in services even though actual costs are hard to pinpoint. At the local level, a study by the Texas Comptroller found that illegal immigrants pay more than $513 million in taxes but cost hospitals $1.3 billion in uncompensated health care and $141.9 million for incarceration, not to mention the cost for other services. The Pew Hispanic Center estimates that 1.65 million illegal immigrants live in Texas.
Monday, April 09, 2012
Pro-Shariah Group Launches Campaign
http://news.investors.com/Article.aspx?id=606641&ibdbot=1&p=2
The Islamic Circle of North America has launched a $3 million campaign to convince Americans that Shariah, the legal code of Islam, is no threat. ICNA is not exactly the best salesman.
The New York-based group, which was founded in 1968 by leaders of the Pakistani branch of the radical Muslim Brotherhood, is promoting Shariah law in a "25-city education tour" that features billboards, radio and TV ads, town hall forums and campus interfaith events.
"The plan is to clear up common misconceptions about Shariah and the Islamic faith," ICNA says. It's responding to legislative efforts to ban judges from recognizing Shariah law in Kansas, Texas, South Carolina, Georgia, Oklahoma, Florida, Louisiana, Tennessee, Arizona and South Dakota.
"Muslim-Americans are asking for the same fundamental rights to observe Shariah" as other faiths enjoy observing their tenets, ICNA asserts.
Of course, Shariah involves far more than just worship. It commands a separate political system. Unlike other religions, it seeks to substitute the U.S. Constitution with its own commandments, which discriminate against women and non-Muslims, restrict free speech, and prescribe cruel and unusual punishment, among other things.
Through groups such as ICNA, as well as the hundreds of mosques it controls, the Muslim Brotherhood teaches Muslim-Americans that Shariah is the law of the land. This is in direct contravention of the so-called supremacy clause, which states: "This Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby."
Shariah has already crept into U.S. court cases, mostly involving family law. Some heavily Muslim areas of the U.S. have become "no-go zones," where domestic abuse cases, even honor killings, are covered up.
But then, ICNA knows all this. That's why it's trying to disarm the public through a massive propaganda campaign in the U.S.
The ICNA official behind the campaign, Sabeel Ahmed, has privately told Muslims: "We should use every opportunity presented or created to sensitize non-Muslim peers and school staff with Islam and establish an environment in which everywhere a non-Muslims (sic) turn, they notice Islam portrayed in a positive way and get influenced by it and eventually accept Islam with Allah's guidance, insha Allah."
It's plain that ICNA has an agenda other than protecting religious freedom. But it goes beyond conversion of non-Muslims. Here's what ICNA is really hiding:
• The secret archives of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood, seized by FBI agents in 2004, list ICNA among "our organizations."
• The document, found in the basement of a terror suspect in Annandale, Va., and translated from Arabic, says "their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house, so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."
• The same Brotherhood charter calls for the creation one day of a "Central Islamic Court" in America, according to the best-seller "Muslim Mafia."
• ICNA recently merged with a sister group — the Muslim American Society — which the Justice Department says is the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.
• ICNA's "Great Leaders of the last 100 Years" features the late Pakistani Brotherhood leader Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, who has said: "Islam wishes to do away with all states and governments anywhere."
• It also lionizes the late Egyptian Brotherhood leader Sayyid Qutb, who stated: "Wherever an Islamic community exists, it has a God-given right to step forward and take control of the political authority so that it may establish the divine system (Shariah) on earth."
• ICNA has featured in its magazine, "The Message," the writings of the Muslim Brotherhood's spiritual leader, Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who has stated the following: "What we seek is that legislations and codes be within the limits of the flawless texts and the overall objectives of the Shariah and the Islamic message." Qaradawi, banned from U.S. entry since 1999, has also declared: "We will conquer America."
Those running ICNA's ads and plastering highways (including New York's Lincoln Tunnel) with billboards should know what they're dealing with — a subversive group running a disinformation campaign.
Sunday, April 08, 2012
Warren Buffett Suggests ...
"I could end the deficit in 5 minutes," he told CNBC. "You just
pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more
than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible
for re-election.
The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds)
took only 3 months & 8 days to be ratified! Why? Simple!
The people demanded it. That was in 1971 - before Computers e-mail,
cell phones, etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took one (1) year
or less to become the law of the land - all because of public pressure.
Warren Buffet is asking each addressee to forward this email to
a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask
each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will
have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed
around.
Congressional Reform Act of 2011
1. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no
pay when they're out of office.
2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social
Security.
All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the
Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into
the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the
American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all
Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise.
Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and
participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the
American people.
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void
effective 1/1/12. The American people did not make this
contract with Congressmen/women.
Congress made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in
Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers
envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their
term(s), then go home and back to work.
Thursday, April 05, 2012
Obamacare Preview
Forwarded, I did not fact check (Who do you trust?):
I received this article from a very close friend who is an RN. She asked me to read it and send it on so, here it is...I do not like what I have read, but you make your own decision. I did not read the whole bill that will be put to a vote but I think this is right!!!! Sharon
I had one of the most troubling, most disturbing conversations ever with
Julie's sister-in-law, Dr. Suzanne Allen, head of emergency services at the
Johnson City Medical Center in Tennessee. We were discussing the "future"
and I asked her had she seen any affects of Obama Care in her work?
"Oh, yes. We are seeing cutbacks throughout the services we provide. For
example, we are now having to deal with patients who would normally receive
dialysis can no longer be accepted. In the past, there was always automatic
approval under Medicare for anyone who needed dialysis -- not anymore." So,
what will be their outcome? "They will die soon without dialysis," she
stated.
What about other services? She indicated as of 2013 (after the election), no
one over 75 will be given major medical procedures unless approved by
locally administered Ethics Panels. These Panels will determine whether a
patient receives medical treatment or not. While details on specific
operating procedures and schedules, Dr. Allen points out that most
life-threatening emergencies do not occur during normal hospital business
hours, and if there are emergencies that depend to be resolve within minutes
or just few hours, the likely hood of getting these Panels approval in time
to save a life are going to be very challenging and difficult, if not
impossible she said.
This applies to major operations such as receiving stents, bypass surgery,
kidney operations, or treating for an aneurysm that would be normally
covered under Medicare today. In other words, if you needed a life-saving
operation, Medicare will not provide coverage anymore after 2013 if you are
75 or over. When in 2013? "We haven't been given a specific date -- could be
in January or July....but it's after the election."
This is shocking to any of us who will be 75 this year. Her advice -- get
healthy and stay healthy. We do not know the specifics of the actual
implementation of the full Obama Care policies and procedures -- "they
haven't filtered down to the local level yet. But we are already seeing
severe cuts in what we provide to the elderly -- we refused dialysis to an
individual who was 78 just the other day....we refused to give stents to a
gentleman who was in his late 80s." Every day, she said, we are seeing these
cutbacks aimed at reducing care across the board for anyone who is over 75.
We can only hope that Obama Care will be overturned by the Supreme Court
-- otherwise, this is a death sentence to those who are over 75....perhaps
you should pass this on to your friends who are thinking of voting for Obama
this year.
Regardless if you have private health care coverage now (I have Aetna
Medicare Part B) -- it will no longer apply after 2013 if the Ethics Panels
disapprove of a procedure that may save your life.
Scary, scary, scary. Think about this? You? Your parents? Your loved ones?
Didn't know about it? Of course, not. As Nancy Pelosi said...."well, if you
want to know what's in the bill, you'll have to read it....." After it was
passed.
This is a graphic reminder of the need to stay healthy. Get your plot now at
Forest Lawn....while they last. Is this a death sentence to those of us who
will reach 75?.....Yes!
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Obama v. Supreme Court
When it comes to the Constitution, the Obama administration can't lay a glove on the Supreme Court
By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Published April 03, 2012| FoxNews.com
Earlier this week, President Obama took a cheap shot at the Supreme Court by suggesting that because its members are “unelected” they are somehow without authority to invalidate unconstitutional legislation. This is hardly a sentiment that should come from anyone sworn to uphold the Constitution, much less a public servant who is a lawyer, much less a person who once taught constitutional law at one of the nation’s best law schools.
The whole purpose of a life-tenured, unelected, independent judiciary is to be anti-democratic; to preserve life, liberty, and property from the tyranny of the majority. Without such a judiciary, nothing but brute force would protect us from a Congress that recognized no limits on its authority.
Suppose that Congress, over the president’s veto, declared Joe Biden insane and removed him from office, or directed that Mrs. Obama lose custody of her children because she sent one of her daughters on a foreign trip without either parent, or that the First Amendment does not apply to those who hate the Chicago Cubs? Wouldn’t the president expect that “an unelected group of people” in black robes would interfere with those actions?
Has he actually forgotten that an unelected group of people overturned segregated schools which was the beginning of the end of Jim Crow laws, ordered the government to try or to free people it has arrested, prevented the prosecution of unpopular speech, invalidated the federal regulation of guns near schools, and ordered a president who thought he was above the law to turn over subpoenaed tapes to a federal district court?
The Supreme Court firmly established in Marbury v. Madison in 1803 that government behavior that is repugnant to the Constitution is not valid, and it is the duty of the courts to make that determination and to invalidate such behavior. This is called “judicial review:” It is the power of the courts to review the acts of the other branches of the federal government, and to review the laws of the states, and to void them when they exceed the confines of the Constitution. No serious legal scholar has questioned this power in the past 175 years.
The president is entitled to his own opinions, just like everyone else is. He is free to argue and to predict that ObamaCare should and will be upheld. But he cannot seriously suggest, with intellectual honesty, that the Court is without lawful authority to invalidate an act of Congress that the Court determines is repugnant to the Constitution.
Nor can he, with intellectual honesty, issue veiled threats to the Court.
The Court is his equal, as a branch of government. But since 1803, the Court is superior to the president on having the final say as to what the laws and what the Constitution mean; and the president knows that.
This Court, which has no army but does have a rich and unbroken tradition of commanding fidelity from the other branches of the government, cannot be intimidated by him. He can criticize it to his heart’s content; but he cannot lay a glove on the Supreme Court.
Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written six books on the U.S. Constitution. The most recent is "It Is Dangerous To Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom." Follow him on Twitter @judgenap and Facebook at Judge Napolitano.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/04/03/when-it-comes-to-constitution-obama-cannot-lay-glove-on-supreme-court/#ixzz1r4njZ3SS