Saturday, June 30, 2012

Las Vegas Odds Maker Predicts ...

Most political predictions are made by biased pollsters, pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or Democrats. I am neither. I am a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, and a well-known Vegas oddsmaker with one of the most accurate records of predicting political races.

But as an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions. I predicted back then- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.

Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?

First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.

Now to an analysis of the voting blocks that matter in U.S. politics:

*Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Christians. He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not good news for Obama.

*Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama.

*Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel. Many Jewish voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama's Jewish support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60’s. This is not good news for Obama.

*Youth voters. Obama’s biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4 years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are disillusioned, frightened, and broke- a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting percentages. This not good news for Obama.

*Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That won’t happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.

*Small Business owners. Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I'm a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to “give someone different a chance.” I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business...that he’d support unions over the private sector in a big way...that he'd overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didn’t listen. Four years later, I can't find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.

*Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.

*Suburban moms. The issue isn’t contraception…it’s having a job to pay for contraception. Obama’s economy frightens these moms. They are worried about putting food on the table. They fear for their children’s future. This is not good news for Obama.

*Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24 points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked him. This is not good news for Obama. Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying “I didn’t vote for Obama 4 years ago. But he’s done such a fantastic job, I can’t wait to vote for him today.” Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure? Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obama’s radical and risky socialist agenda. It's Reagan-Carter all over again.

But I’ll give Obama credit for one thing - he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Justice Roberts: Genius

Chief Justice Roberts Is A Genius
Posted on June 28, 2012 by I.M. Citizen

Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.

It will be a short-lived celebration.

Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS.

Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.

Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax. This is also critical. Recall back during the initial Obama-care battles, the Democrats called it a penalty, Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the Supreme Court, they said ‘hey, a penalty or a tax, either way’. So, Roberts gave them a tax. It is now the official law of the land — beyond word-play and silly shenanigans. Obama-care is funded by tax dollars. Democrats now must defend a tax increase to justify the Obama-care law.

Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — ‘comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.’

Roberts ruled that is a no-no. If a state takes the money, fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state refuses money, the federal government can’t penalize the state by yanking other funding. Therefore, a state can decline to participate in Obama-care without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10, 12, 25 states not participating in “national” health-care? Suddenly, it’s not national, is it?

Ultimately, Roberts supported states rights by limiting the federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause and he forced liberals to have to come clean and admit that Obama-care is funded by tax increases.

Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did more than his part and should be applauded.

And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown through his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.

Brilliant.

Rep. West Statement

Rep. West Statement on the United States Supreme Court Healthcare Ruling

(WASHINGTON)--- Congressman Allen West (R-FL) released this statement today after the United States Supreme Court announced it has ruled to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act:

"The United States Supreme Court has ruled to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by extending the power of the United States Congress to tax Americans' behavior. This is a sad day for Americans, as they will be taxed to pay for benefits they may not need or want as part of the insurance they are forced to buy. With this decision, Congress has been granted infinite taxation power, and there are no longer any limits on what the federal government can tax its citizens to do.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will hit the middle class especially hard, as hundreds of thousands of jobs will be lost as businesses try to avoid the penalties and costs created by the healthcare law. The healthcare law will cost trillions of dollars, raise costs for employers and create huge incentives for them to drop health insurance.

Benjamin Franklin did indeed state, 'In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.' However, Dr. Franklin never envisioned the federal government would use its power of taxation to punish people for not purchasing health care. Today, individual sovereignty in America has been defeated."

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Feds, AZ Officials Blast DHS

Federal agents, Arizona officials blast Homeland Security's 'business as usual' approach in wake of Supreme Court ruling
By Perry Chiaramonte
Published June 26, 2012
FoxNews.com

The Department of Homeland Security's refusal to cooperate with Arizona's court-tested crackdown on illegal immigration has field agents fuming, FoxNews.com has learned.

Within hours of the Supreme Court on Monday upholding of Arizona's requirement that police officers verify with federal authorities the immigration status of people they stop if suspected of being in the United States illegally, the Department of Homeland Security issued a memo telling agents not to take action unless the people are criminals, have recently arrived or pose a threat to national security.

“Anyone that is determined to be a low-level threat is subject to being released back into the general population since ICE does not view them as criminals,” one DHS agent told FoxNews.com. “It saddened me to see that ICE is choosing to operate under a ‘business as usual’ mind set rather than seeing how they can work with Arizona to accomplish the goals that they both share.”

What DHS considers "discretion" in choosing which illegal immigrants to potentially deport is tantamount to a refusal to enforce the law, according to a contingent of Arizona lawmakers, who accused the Obama administration of "declaring war against Arizona" in a letter to ICE chief John Morton.

"Rather than work cooperatively with the states, as federalism requires, the administration unwisely decided to unilaterally and abruptly terminate multiple agreements under a program that fostered federal-state cooperation in tackling a very difficult public safety threat to Americans, reads the letter, from GOP Reps. Paul Gosar, Dave Schweikert and Trent Franks.

The agent who talked to FoxNews.com said his colleagues are as outraged as he is and that federal policy makes it impossible to catch illegal immigrants who are criminals, unless they are caught in the act.

“The biggest problem with their catch-and-release method is that ICE does not have an effective process for identifying detainees," he said. Most detainees do not carry identification on them and they voluntarily provide their name.

“This leads to a larger problem. ... We already know that there are difficulties with confirming identities of detainees, so how can ICE be sure that they are not putting a criminal back on the street?”

“This leads to a larger problem...we already know that there are difficulties with confirming identities of detainees, so how can ICE be sure that they are not putting a criminal back on the street?”

Last week, Obama announced that most young illegal immigrants would be allowed to stay in the country and get work visas, under certain conditions, including that they were not a national security threat.

The memo issued Monday keeps in place the prior policy of choosing which illegal immigrants can be targeted for deportation, even after the Supreme Court ruled part of Arizona's law constitutional.

“The court’s decision does not disturb U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) existing discretion in deciding which aliens should be taken into immigration custody or processed for removal from the United States,” the memo states.

Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio said the federal government's refusal to cooperate with his state's law is defacto amnesty.

“We don’t need the federal government," he told Fox News Channel on Tuesday. "We have state laws. The worst is that they [ICE] won’t even respond. This is amnesty."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/26/business-as-usual-for-homeland-security-after-supreme-court-ruling-in-arizona/?test=latestnews#ixzz1yzzOZ6nm

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Obama To Undermine Supreme Court

OBAMA TO UNDERMINE SUPREME COURT RULING

URGENT: The Supreme Court issued a split decision ruling in support of Arizona’s immigration crackdown allowing the state’s law enforcement officials to ask immigration status of those arrested on other charges while striking down three other provisions of the now infamous law SB1070.

Within hours of the split Supreme Court decision to allow Arizona law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of individuals first detained for other reasons, the Obama administration is fighting back against the rule of law.

The ability of law enforcement officers to detain folks is THE most important part of the entire law and by upholding this provision, the Justices gave Arizona the teeth it needs to enforce federal immigration law with or without the help of the feds.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer responded to the court’s ruling, calling it a “legal victory” for the rule of law and that “every law, including those against both illegal immigration and racial profiling” will be enforced. Gov. Brewer has recently issued a new Executive Order asking that special training for the Constitutional enforcement of Arizona’s SB1070 be provided to all of Arizona’s law enforcement officers

Make no mistake – this is a victory for Sheriff Joe just as it is for Gov. Brewer and the entire state of Arizona. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his officers can keep doing what they are doing – standing up for U.S. Citizens and enforcing immigration law while Obama flounders amidst plummeting approval ratings.

Barack Obama may think he is being clever (and the mainstream media undoubtedly will think so as well) in his blatant attempt to sabotage the state’s decision to enforce federal immigration law, but if anything, Obama is playing right into the capable hands of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio when it comes to enforcing immigration law.

Obama has childishly suspended the program known as 287(g) to his own demise. The program, which allows local authorities to make immigration-based arrests and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials to those reported up for deportation, was suspended by this over-bloated administration in the hopes of forcing local police to rely on federal officials to make immigration-based arrests.

To take it one step further, under Obama’s orders, ICE will not respond to calls from Arizona when it reports illegal immigrants unless the person in question is wanted for a felony.

Sheriff Joe and all other Arizona law enforcement can keep enforcing immigration law while detained illegal immigrants have no idea how long they’re gonna sit in detention (likely in Sheriff Joe’s tent city in 100+ degree heat). After all, local law enforcement cannot actually deport illegal immigrants back across the southern border or elsewhere, but they CAN hold them for federal processing…

Obama and his right-hand man Attorney General Eric Holder will denounce Sheriff Joe’s enforcement of immigration law as racist even though more and more illegal immigrants are coming in from China than from Mexico. That’s where you and I come in.

Obama and Holder are going to try to use Sheriff Joe as a distraction from the Fast & Furious scandal. No matter how hard they try, we aren’t going to let this administration hide behind the public relations banner proclaiming it will “life the shadow of deportation” from illegal immigrants while ignoring or otherwise going around existing federal immigration law.

Pro-Amnesty lobbyists are already working ‘fast and furious’ as they prepare new litigation tactics to intimidate Arizona following their loss at the Supreme Court.

That’s why we must act right now to show our continued support for the State of Arizona, the enforcement of immigration law, and the security of our sovereign borders against illegal immigration.

Illegal Immigration News

Today's Illegal Immigration News
Tuesday, June 26, 2012

STATE IMMIGRATION LAW CHALLENGES TO MOVE FORWARD

Yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling overturned three out of four provisions of Arizona’s legislative crackdown on illegal immigration leaving the door wide open for courts to strike down similar laws in other states trying to uphold federal immigration laws.

Although the Supreme Court ruled in favor of allowing local law enforcement to check the immigration status of suspected illegal immigrants arrested for other crimes, the Obama administration revoked federal support from Arizona within hours of the ruling and will likely do the same across the country, undermining the ruling of the Supreme Court and the continued enforcement of immigration law.

Challenges to anti-illegal immigration laws passed in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Indiana and Utah will likely move forward now that the Supreme Court has ruled on the issue establishing an important legal precedent.

BODIES OF FOUR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS DISCOVERED IN ARIZONA DESERT

U.S. Border Patrol agents discovered the bodies of four suspected illegal immigrants who died of heat exposure after illegally entering the United States via the Arizona desert in triple digit temperatures over the weekend.

Three of the bodies were discovered separately in the desert south and west of Tucson on Saturday. The fourth body was discovered on Saturday near Sells, located on the Native American reservation Tohono O’odham Nation, when agents rescued a pregnant, dehydrated Guatemalan woman sitting beside the body of her husband. The couple had been abandoned by their smuggler after crossing the border two days earlier.

Tucson Sector Border Patrol agents said they rescued 61 illegal immigrants last month compared to 38 during May 2011. Nineteen illegal immigrants died in that time frame this year compared to five in May 2011.

Monday, June 25, 2012

Supreme Court Gives Green Light

Supreme Court gives states a green light to follow Arizona's lead on immigration

By Roy Beck, Monday, June 25, 2012

In all the analysis of whether Arizona or Pres. Obama came out on top in the Supreme Courts ruling on S.B. 1070 today, the key question is: how well did unemployed Americans fare?

And the answer is: Very well.

Combined with another Court ruling on an Arizona law last year, states now have all the legal room they need to pursue attrition-through-enforcement measures that cause illegal aliens to depart from a state, opening up jobs for unemployed Americans and legal immigrants.

Although headlines have focused on the court knocking down three of four provisions before it, it should be noted that S.B. 1070 began with 14 sections. After all the challenges at several court levels, 11 of those sections are still standing and the court today ruled against only half of the twelfth. The one that was cleared today by the Court was the right of police to question people about their immigration status. This may be the most important provision in causing illegal aliens to leave Arizona, judging by the frenzy of concerned reaction by the pro-amnesty forces and the Obama administration.

We have always regarded S.B. 1070 as supplementary to the far more important, earlier Arizona bill that requires every employer to use E-Verify to keep illegal aliens and tourists from taking jobs. The Obama administration also opposed this effort, but the Court last year entirely upheld the right of states to protect its workers in that way.

Combining the two rulings, Arizona now has the Supreme Court-approved model to show all other states that they dont have to sit idly by while an estimated 7 million illegal aliens take U.S. jobs in construction, manufacturing, service, transportation and even some in the professions. These are the occupations where most of the 20 million Americans who are unemployed or forced into part-time work are also seeking a job.

Since 1986, the prevailing theory about illegal immigration in Washington has been one of inevitability that nothing can be done to cause illegal aliens to leave once they get into the country. Hence, Congress passed seven amnesties between 1986 and 2000.

Now, Arizona and presumably a number of other states can be full-effort laboratories to prove inevitability a false theory.

We are heartened that even in writing the majority opinion that blocked three parts of Arizonas law, Justice Kennedy recognized that decisions by three straight presidents to significantly ignore federal immigration law have put states in a bind.

"The pervasiveness of federal regulation does not diminish the importance of immigration policy to the States," he wrote. "Arizona bears many of the consequences of unlawful immigration. . . . Statistics alone do not capture the full extent of Arizonas concerns. Accounts in the record suggest there is an epidemic of crime, safety risks, serious property damage, and environmental problems associated with the influx of illegal migration across private land near the Mexican border."

In his dissent, Justice Scalia was much more specific, citing the Obama administrations announcement just two weeks ago that it would refuse to enforce the law against illegal aliens who would benefit from the DREAM Act amnesty that Congress has rejected three times.

"After this case was argued and while it was under consideration," Scalia wrote, "the Secretary of Homeland Security announced a program exempting from immigration enforcement some 1.4 million illegal immigrants under the age of 30.

"The president said at a news conference that the new program is 'the right thing to do' in light of Congresss failure to pass the Administrations proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court (majority) does, that Arizona contradicts federal by enforcing application of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind."

As if to underscore Scalias assessment of the current administration as a nullifier of congressionally-passed laws, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano only hours after the ruling, announced that she would suspend yet another enforcement required under federal immigration laws. Because the Court ruling will result in a lot more illegal aliens being brought to the attention of the feds, she said, her department will suspend the 287(g) program in Arizona, and pledged that nothing in the ruling will interfere with the administrative amnesty announced last week.

Fortunately, all states now have a bright green light from the Court to follow Arizonas lead in enforcing the laws in the way that Congress intended, even if the president insists on violating those laws.

(This analysis originally appeared as an op-ed on FoxNews.com)

Illegal Immigration News

Today's Illegal Immigration News
Monday, June 25, 2012

CA ATTEMPTS TO HALT DETAINING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS… AGAIN

California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano’s AB1081 is gaining momentum after Barack Obama announced backdoor amnesty for an estimated two million illegal immigrants under the age of 30. If passed, AB1081 will stop California law enforcement from participating in the mandatory federal Secure Communities program by prohibiting officers from holding illegal immigrants who are not yet convicted of a serious felony in jail.

The MANDATORY federal data-sharing program requires all law enforcement officers to submit fingerprints of arrestees to federal officials for an immigration status check. If an arrested individual is discovered to be in the country illegally, Immigration and Customs Enforcement can place a detainer on the individual to be held a local jail until ICE can take custody.

Roughly 50,000 individuals convicted of major violent offenses (such as murder and rape) have been deported through the program from across the country.

KRAUTHAMMER NAILS OBAMA ADMIN FOR AMNESTY FIAT

In his recent op-ed, syndicated journalist Charles Krauthammer nailed the Obama Administration for its blatant violation of our laws, calling Obama’s recent backdoor amnesty memo “naked lawlessness.” He also calls out Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s for sugarcoating the phrase “prosecutorial discretion.”

Krauthammer offers this worthwhile comparison on the “fundamental rewriting of the law”:

“Imagine: A Republican president submits to Congress a bill abolishing the capital gains tax. Congress rejects it. The president then orders the IRS to stop collecting capital gains taxes, and declares that anyone refusing to pay them will suffer no fine, no penalty, no sanction whatsoever. (Analogy first suggested by law professor John Yoo.)

It would be a scandal, a constitutional crisis, a cause for impeachment. Why? Because unlike, for example, war powers, this is not an area of perpetual executive-legislative territorial contention. Capital gains is straightforward tax law. Just as Obama’s bombshell amnesty-by-fiat is a subversion of straightforward immigration law.”

Earlier this year Barack Obama admitted that the tactic of unilaterally granting amnesty is unlawful… but then his poll numbers continued to decline and he did it anyways.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Today's Illegal Immigration News

SHERIFF JOE RESPONDS TO OBAMA’S AMNESTY EDICT

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has gone on the record stating his refusal to enforce Obama’s latest amnesty law in Maricopa County, AZ.

During an interview with Phoenix’s ABC15 the tough-as-nails sheriff said, "I think people from Mexico are now going to feel, 'Hey come on in and we'll get by with it.' But it won't happen in this county. They will still be arrested."

The Associated Press estimates that as many as 800,000 illegal immigrants will no longer have to fear deportation under the Obama administration’s new amnesty law announced this past Friday. The politically motivated law came from the Oval Office in hopes of shoring up the Latino vote in Obama’s favor by giving a free pass to young illegal immigrants brought here by their parents or other relatives.

Mexican President Thanks Obama for Immigration Changes

The Weekly Standard reports that Mexican president Felipe Calderon recently thanked Barack Obama for his Friday announcement to grant backdoor amnesty to 800,000+ young illegal immigrants:

“I would like to thank personally, and on behalf of the Mexican nation, President Barack Obama for his valuable decision by executive order to give an opportunity for young people who were not born in the United States but who arrived in that great nation before they were 16 years of age, or who are studying in university, or who have served in the United States armed forces, for them not to be deported for at least a period of two years, so this is a clear and certain situation for them.

We believe that this is very just. It's a humanitarian action. And it's an unprecedented action in our opinion. And in this sense, Mr. President, we would like to thank you for the valor and courage that you had in implementing this action. I am sure that many, many families in the United States of America are thankful to you as well.”

Friday, June 15, 2012

Obama Bypasses Congress, Grants Amnesty For Votes

Obama to Grant Amnesty to Young Illegal Immigrants Today!

The scheming Obama administration will announce at 1:15 P.M. today its plan to ENFORCE THE DREAM ACT GRANTING AMNESTY TO AN ESTIMATED 800,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS who entered this country at a young age!

It’s here, just like we knew it would be – Obama’s DREAM Act Executive Order.

Taking a cue from the successful election tactics of France’s new SOCIALIST president, Barack Hussein Obama will STOP DEPORTING ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS who entered this country at a young age, and it’s starting TODAY!

Despite our repeated defeat of the DREAM – Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors – Act on Capitol Hill, Obama is taking matters into his own greedy hands to force a nightmare executive order on us instead.

Obama’s re-election depends on shoring up his favorability with Hispanic voters in swing states like Florida and Colorado, and what better way to shore up the vote than by granting their young illegal immigrant relatives Amnesty right from the presidential podium.

Attempting to make Amnesty more palatable for our bankrupt country, Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano justified it as helping “productive young people.”

But you better believe this is a cold, calculated political decision – one made in Obama’s best interest, not in America’s because not only will these 800,000+ individuals never face deportation, they will LEGALLY join millions of unemployed Americans competing for work across the county.

The desperate Campaigner-in-Chief Obama’s decision to grant Amnesty via executive fiat could very well hand him the election in November unless we act right now.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters earlier this morning that the traitorous announcement is scheduled for 1:15 p.m. She also tried to sugarcoat Obama’s Amnesty announcement as a “grant of deferred action” and an “exercise of discretion so that these young people are not in the removal system.”

"It will help us continue to streamline immigration enforcement, ensure that resources are not spent pursuing the removal of low priority cases involving productive young people,” said Napolitano.

But we’re not buying it, and neither is the rest of America.

Just as we saw the DREAM – Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors – Act defeated time and time again, we shall see Obama’s executive fiat doling out Amnesty and handing over our jobs to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants DEFEATED. This time, however, we’re working from the top-down.

This is only the beginning, America.

The Amnesty slippery slope will get even steeper as the election gets closer and Obama gets more desperate.

More and more illegal immigrants will be given a free pass regardless of the dangerous social and economic implications until all 12 million are here to stay with no recourse for the folks like you and I whose country is being stolen from beneath our feet.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Homebuying: Prison Rape

Is Homebuying Like Prison Rape?
Sun, 10 Jun 2012, 5:56pm

I can't find a more appropriate analogy.

The entire market is controlled by bug-eyed, cackling psychopaths who derive monstrous pleasure from torturing and extorting their victims, directly and through horrific inflation of market valuations which everyone pays for and by which they make new gains in their satanic enterprise.

A young family is greeted by a commission-fueled psychopath who lies to them that the place has 100 offers and in 15 minutes they'll be priced out of the market forever and the kids will grow up homeless and one spouse or another will likely - though righteously - suicide when it becomes clear they passed up their only chance for a normal life.

Then, thus terrorized, they're shoved in front of the Realtor®'s friend in the mortgage business, the psychopathic mortgage broker who announces that the family, although holding 20 percent for a downpayment, only qualifies for a subprime exploding ARM that will max out whatever fees the mortgage broker hopes to get on the deal. This freak twists the knife by making vague threats that if they turn down his generous offer, he will report that they were turned down for the note and fuck their credit forever.

The cell phone rings.

It's the Realtor®. There are 70 other offers that just came in on the house, all over yours but the seller "really likes you people - and, hey, I do, too and we want you to get the house. Can you match the top offer. It's only $37,000 more. My mortgage guy can help you out. Of course, for this extraordinary service, I would need some compensation. It's traditional, you know."

The exploding ARM detonates and the couple are hung with a 12 percent note. The market tanks. The mortgage broker has disappeared and the Realtor® appears in the papers, convicted of fraud and extortion amounting to $120 million for which he will serve 3 months in jail. The husband overhears the Realtor® in a bar bragging about retiring to Cyprus where he has a villa with a staff and six Russian mail order brides. Bouncers stop him from plunging the jagged edge of a broken bottle into his throat. Most of the crowd cheers him on but a gun shot from the publican puts down the riot.

No one will refinance the couple. The house was grossly overpriced to begin with. The phone rings. It's a mortgage banker at one of the banks that turned them down. A friend has a short-sale consultancy that could get them out from under. A few bucks up front - but it could save your life - and we can set you up in a new place. Desperate, despairing, they sign some papers and move into a rental home that had no utilities working. They use their cells and finally the owners get the electricity turned on but the gas company refuses to return their calls.

They wait for the call about the disposition of the short sale but it never comes and they can't get the consultant on the phone. A friend calls and tells them their old house has been sold. It's in the notices in the newspaper.

The door flies open. It's the local sheriff evicting them. The house was foreclosed a year before and they're trespassing. They tell their story and the sheriff roars laughing. You're the fifth couple this week he had to tell that they'd been paying rent on a foreclosure to a scamming Realtor®.

Sheriff throws them into the street and the family is forced to sleep in their car behind the Piggly Wiggly and the children adjust admirably to eating from the same dumpster they have to defecate into.

The couple shows their copies of the paperwork to a legal aid services attorney. Every transaction they've completed has been fraudulent. Every professional committed egregious crimes.

The husband buys a hunting rifle and vows revenge. The wife can't get through to him and takes the kids and the car and sets off to her mother's house. A month later, the husband dies in a SWAT raid on the home of the original Realtor® who he managed to behead with a fireplace shovel.

In a dramatic exit strategy, he grabbed the decapitated body and used it as a shield in a dash to his car. SWAT snipers shredded him just steps from his car. The wife watched it all on TV with her mother, weeping, 'Mommy, all we wanted to do was have our own home for the kids.'

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Bogalusa Louisiana

Video credit: http://www.youtube.com/user/jerryt602 A local soldier walked into this Texaco outside of Bogalusa, Louisiana and was told by the Muslim clerk, "We don't serve your kind here." This is getting out of hand. The feds will be giving Arab muslims special rights and privileges next week. More tax breaks to open businesses as well as funding. There are even areas in this country that the muslims have set up and are ruled by there own law with no fear of reprisal from our liberal government.
Texaco 63298 Highway 10, Bogalusa, LA 70427 (601) 636-1065 Texaco Fuels 1-800-689-3998 cccweb@chevron.com Consumer Connection Center PO Box 4000 Bellaire, TX 77402-4000 866-756-1522 Fax

Goodbye Sweden

Saturday, June 09, 2012

More Government Control

Labor Department backs off plan forcing reporters to use government-issued computers
Published June 09, 2012
FoxNews.com

The Labor Department has backed off a plan to force news agencies to use government-issued computers and other equipment to report on jobless reports and other key economic data, following a GOP-led House hearing this week, according to several published reports.

Agency officials have said they want reporters who analyze, then write about economic reports inside their so-called “lock up” room to use U.S. computers, software and Internet lines so the government can further protect against such potential security breaches as hacking.

But the plan also resulted in cries about potential free-speech violations and the government now having computer access to news agencies.

“This proposal threatens the First Amendment,” Bloomberg News Executive Editor Dan Moss said during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing. “The government would literally open the reporters’ notebooks.”

Carl Fillichio, a Labor Department communications specialist, told committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., at the close of the hearing Wednesday that he would provide some flexibility on the June 15 deadline.

On Friday, Fillichio issued an e-mail received by Bloomberg and several other new agencies that said the start date is being revised, according to The Washington Examiner and NASDAQ.com Labor Department officials could not be reached Saturday.

The new date will be announced next week, according to a copy of the email obtained by the Examiner.

"Per my commitment to Chairman Issa's request, we are going to move the effective date on changes to the lock up,” Fillichio’s email purportedly states.

The Examiner also reports the delay, for more negotiations, was likely influenced by some news organizations having vowed to seek a court injunction to stop the implementations of the proposed changes.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/09/labor-department-backs-off-plan-forcing-reporters-to-use-government-issued/?test=latestnews#ixzz1xL57j0Uk

Friday, June 08, 2012

Why Bush Was Bad At The End Of His Term ...

George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH

The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.

The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this: January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress. At the time:

The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%

George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH

Remember the day...

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!

Unemployment... To this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES! Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy.

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?

OBAMA and the Democrat Congress

So when someone tries to blame Bush...

REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 &2011.

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

Thursday, June 07, 2012

Sunday, June 03, 2012

Ambassador Ron Prosor At The UN

Israel's UN Ambassador Ron Prosor

Thank you, Madame President.

Let me begin by thanking you, personally, for your outstanding leadership of the Security Council this month.

Churchill once said, "In the time that it takes a lie to get halfway around the world, the truth is still getting its pants on."

In the barren deserts of the Middle East , myths find fertile ground to grow wild. Facts often remain buried in the sand.
The myths forged in our region travel abroad - and can surprisingly find their way into these halls.

I would like to use today's debate as an opportunity to address just a few of the myths that have become a permanent hindrance to our discussion of the Middle East here at the United Nations.

Madame President,

Myth number one: the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is the central conflict in the Middle East . If you solve that conflict, you solve all the other conflicts in the region.

Make no mistake: it is important for Israel and the Palestinians to resolve our longstanding conflict for its own merits.
Yet, the truth is that conflicts in Syria , Yemen , Egypt , Bahrain , and many other parts of the Middle East have absolutely nothing to do with Israel .

It is obvious that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict won't stop the persecution of minorities across the region, end the subjugation of women, or heal the sectarian divides. Obsessing over Israel has not stopped Assad's tanks from flattening entire communities. On the contrary, it has only distracted attention from his crimes.

This debate - even this morning - has lost any sense of proportion. Thousands are being killed in Syria , hundreds in Yemen , dozens in Iraq - and yet, this debate again repeatedly is focusing on the legitimate actions of the government of the only democracy in the Middle East .

And dedicating the majority of this debate to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, month after month after month, has not stopped the Iranian regime's centrifuges from spinning. Iran 's ambitions for nuclear weapons are the single greatest threat to the Middle East , and the entire world.

The Iranian nuclear program continues to advance at the speed of an express train. The international community's efforts to stop them are moving at the pace of the local train, pausing at every stop for some nations to get on and off. The danger of inaction is clear. We cannot allow the diplomatic channel to provide another avenue for the Iranian regime to stall for more time, as they inch closer and closer to a nuclear weapon.

Madame President,

Myth number two: there is a humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip.

In fact, numerous international organizations have said clearly that there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza , including the Deputy Head of the Red Cross Office in the area.

Gaza 's real GDP grew by more than 25% during the first three quarters of 2011. Exports are expanding. International humanitarian projects are moving forward at a rapid pace.

There is not a single civilian good that cannot enter Gaza today. Yet, as aid flows into the area, missiles fly out. This is the crisis in Gaza .
And that is what keeps Gaza from realizing its real potential.

It is a simple equation. If it is calm in Israel , it will be calm in Gaza . But the people of Gaza will face hardship as long as terrorists use them as human shields to rain rockets down on Israeli cities.

Each rocket in Gaza is armed with a warhead capable of causing a political earthquake that would extend well beyond Israel 's borders.
It will only take one rocket that lands in the wrong place at the wrong time to change the equation on the ground.
If that happens, Israel 's leaders would be forced to respond in a completely different manner.

It is time for all in this Chamber to finally wake up to that dangerous reality. The Security Council has not condemned a single rocket attack from Gaza .
History's lessons are clear. Today's silence is tomorrow's tragedy.

Madame President,

Myth number three: settlements are the primary obstacle to peace.

How many times have we heard that argument in this chamber? Just this month, the Human Rights Council proposed yet another "fact-finding" mission to Israel . It will explore...surprise, surprise...Israeli settlements.

Today, I'd like to save the Human Rights Council and the international community some time and energy. The facts have already been found.
They are plain for all to see. The fact is that from 1948 until 1967, the West Bank was part of Jordan , and Gaza was part of Egypt .
The Arab World did nothing - it did not lift a finger - to create a Palestinian state. And it sought Israel 's annihilation when not a single settlement stood anywhere in the West Bank or Gaza .

The fact is that in 2005, when I was the Director-General of Israel 's Foreign Ministry, we took every settlement out of Gaza and only got rockets on our cities in return.

The fact is that this Israeli Government put in place an unprecedented ten-month moratorium on settlements.
The Palestinian leadership used the gesture as an opportunity to take Israel and the international community on another ride to nowhere.
For nine out of those ten months, they rejected the moratorium as insufficient - and then demanded that we extend it.
As former U.S. Special Envoy George Mitchell said "what had been less than worthless a few months earlier became indispensable to continue negotiations... [for the Palestinians]."

Madame President,

The primary obstacle to peace is not settlements. The primary obstacle to peace is the so-called "claim of return" - and the Palestinian's refusal to recognize Israel 's right to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

You will never hear Palestinian leaders say "two states for two peoples".
You won't hear them say "two states for two peoples" because today the Palestinian leadership is calling for an independent Palestinian state, but insists that its people return to the Jewish state. This would mean the destruction of Israel .

Some of you might say, "Oh Ambassador, but the Palestinians know that they will have to give up this claim, that's what they whisper quietly at the negotiating table."

Ladies and Gentleman - the Palestinian leadership has never, ever said publicly that they will give up the so-called "claim of return" - neither to the Palestinian people, nor to the Arab World, nor to the international community, or to anyone else.

Since the Palestinian leadership refuses to tell the Palestinian people the truth, the international community has the responsibility and duty to tell them the truth.
You have a duty to stand up and say that the so-called "claim of return" is a non-starter.

Instead of telling the Palestinian people the truth, much of the international community stands idle as the Arab World tries to erase the Jewish people's historical connection to the Land of Israel .

Across the Arab World - and even at this table - you hear claims that Israel is "Judaizing Jerusalem". These accusations come about 3,000 years too late.
It's like accusing the NBA of Americanizing basketball.

Like many nations around this table, the Jewish people have a proud legacy of age-old kings and queens.
It's just that our tradition goes back a few years earlier. Since King David laid the cornerstone for his palace in the 10th Century BC, Jerusalem has served as the heart of our faith. In debate after debate, speakers sit in the Security Council and say that Israel is committing "ethnic cleansing" in Jerusalem , even though the percentage of Arab residents in the city has grown from 26% to 35% since 1967.

The holiest sites in Jerusalem , the eternal capital of the Jewish people, were closed only to Jews from 1948 until 1967.
Everyone could come to these sites except Jews. There was absolutely no freedom of worship. The world did not say a word about the situation in Jerusalem at that time.
Since Israel unified the city, it has thrived under the values of tolerance and freedom. For the first time in centuries, sacred places that were once sealed off along religious lines are now permanently open for worship by all peoples.
This is a principle grounded in our values, our actions and our laws.

Madame President,

There is another great truth that this organization has completely overlooked for the past 64 years.
In all of the pages that the UN has written about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, in all of its reports and fact-finding commissions, and in all of the hours dedicated to debate about the Middle East , there is one great untold story. Or - to be more specific - there are more than 850,000 untold stories.

More than 850,000 Jews have been uprooted from their homes in Arab countries during the past 64 years.
These were vibrant communities dating back 2,500 years. On the banks of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, Babylonian Jewry produced many of Judaism's holiest books - and thrived for two millennia. In the great synagogues and libraries of Cairo , Jews preserved the intellectual and scientific treasures of antiquity into the Renaissance. From Aleppo to Aden to Alexandria , Jews stood out as some of the greatest artists, musicians, businessmen, and writers.

All of these communities were wiped out. Age-old family businesses and properties were confiscated. Jewish quarters were destroyed.
Pogroms left synagogues looted, graveyards desecrated and thousands dead. The pages that the UN has written about the Palestinian refugees could fill up soccer stadiums, but not a drop of ink has been spilled about the Jewish refugees. Out of over 1088 UN resolutions on the Middle East , you will not find a single syllable regarding the displacement of Jewish refugees.
There have been more than 172 resolutions exclusively devoted to Palestinian refugees, but not one dedicated to Jewish refugees. The Palestinian refugees have their own UN agency, their own information program, and their own department within the United Nations. None exist for the Jewish refugees. The word "double-standard" does not even begin to describe this gap.
This discrepancy is very convenient for some in this Chamber, but it's not right. The time has come for the UN to end its complicity in trying to erase the stories of 850,000 people from history.

The time has also come to speak openly in these halls about the Arab World's role in maintaining the Palestinians as refugees for more than six decades.
Jews from Arab countries came to refugee camps in Israel , which eventually gave birth to thriving towns and cities. Refugee camps in Arab Countries gave birth to more Palestinian refugees. Israel welcomed its Jewish refugees with citizenship and unlocked their vast potential.
As they rose to the highest levels of society, our refugees lifted the State of Israel to new heights. Imagine if Arab countries had done the same with their Palestinian refugees. Instead, they have cynically perpetuated their status as refugees, for generation after generation.
Across the Arab World, Palestinians have been denied citizenship, rights and opportunities.

All of these are facts that must be neither forgotten nor overlooked, as we look to move forward on the path to peace.

Madame President,

I've saved the most obvious myth for last: the myth that peace can somehow be achieved between Israelis and Palestinians by bypassing direct negotiations. History has shown that peace and negotiations are inseparable. Direct negotiations are the only tool, the only way and the only path to create two-states for two peoples. Last January, Israel offered a clear proposal in Amman for restarting direct negotiations. We presented the Palestinian delegation with negotiating positions on every major issue separating the parties. That proposal - filled with Israel 's vision for peace - continues to gather dust, as Palestinian leaders continue to pile up new pre-conditions for sitting with Israel . They are everywhere except the negotiating table.
It is time for them to give up unilateral efforts to internationalize the conflict and take up the real path to peace.

Madame President,

This week we will observe the two most significant public holidays in Israel - our day of remembrance and our day of independence.
On Wednesday, sirens will sound across Israel . For two minutes, everything will come to a halt. People will stop in their tracks, cars will pull over to the side of highways, and the entire country will pause to remember the more than 22,000 Israelis who have been killed by wars and terrorism in our nation's short history. On Thursday, we will celebrate the rebirth of the Jewish nation - and our 64th year as a free people in our ancient homeland. Against persistent threats and overwhelming odds, Israel has not only survived, but thrived.

I walk the halls of this organization tall and proud of my extraordinary nation - a nation of just 7 million that has produced 10 Nobel prizes; a nation that sends satellites into space, puts electric cars on the road, and develops the technology to power everything from cell phones to solar panels to medical devices.

We intentionally commemorate these two days one after another. As the Israeli people celebrate our independence, we carry the heavy weight of great suffering and sacrifice. The lesson we take from these days is clear. We can never turn a blind eye to the dangers around us. We cannot pretend that we live in a stable region filled with Jeffersonian democracies. But there is another lesson that will fill the hearts of Israelis this week. We can never, ever give up hope for lasting peace. The price of conflict is too high. The evil of war is too great. That is the fundamental truth which guides our leaders.

Madame President,

In the dangerous uncertainty of a turbulent Middle East , the Security Council has never had a greater responsibility to separate myth from truth, and fact from fiction. The clarity of candor has never been more valuable. The need for honest discourse has never been clearer. It is time for this Council to sweep out the cobwebs of old illusions - and plant the seeds for a truly "open" debate on the Middle East . The challenges before us demand nothing less!

Friday, June 01, 2012

Feds Order Halt To Purging ...

Feds order Florida to halt ongoing push to remove ineligible voters from rolls
Published June 01, 2012
Associated Press

TALLAHASSEE, Fla – Federal authorities are demanding that Florida halt its push to remove ineligible voters from the voter rolls.

In a move that comes just months before the state could play a pivotal role in the 2012 presidential election, the U.S. Department of Justice contends that the state is violating federal law in its effort to identify and remove ineligible voters.

The state's effort has already come under fire from local election supervisors who belong to both political parties, as well as Democratic members of Congress and voting rights groups. Chris Cate, a spokesman for the Florida Department of State, said state officials were still reviewing the letter, but hinted Florida may fight federal authorities.

"Bottom line is we are firmly committed to doing the right thing and preventing ineligible voters from being able to cast a ballot," Cate said.

Florida, at the urging of Republican Gov. Rick Scott, began looking for non-U.S. citizens on its voter rolls last year. An initial search turned up as many as 182,000 registered voters who may not be U.S. citizens.

Earlier this year state officials sent to local election officials a much smaller list of more than 2,600 voters and asked supervisors to start the process to remove them from the rolls.

Supervisors, however, have loudly questioned the accuracy of the list, with one GOP supervisor going on Twitter to show the picture of a U.S. passport of one voter found on the list. Earlier this week two Democratic members of Congress held a press conference with a World War II veteran whose citizenship had been questioned.

Federal officials said that the procedures the state is using to identify non-U.S. citizens has not been reviewed to make sure they are not discriminatory. Florida must get approval for changes in voting procedures because five counties are still covered by the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

T. Christian Herren, chief of the voting section of the civil rights division, also said that removing voters from the rolls less than 90 days before a federal election also appears to violate federal law. Florida's primary election is Aug. 14.

Herren's letter gives Florida until June 6 to tell federal authorities whether they plan to halt the purge.

Voting rights groups who had called on the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene praised the decision.

"We commend the attorney general of the United States Eric Holder for ensuring that the right to vote, the fundamental pillar of our democracy is protected for all American citizens," said Advancement Project co-director Penda Hair in a statement.

The intervention of the U.S. Department of Justice came the same day that Florida officials were trying to get another federal agency to help the state verify the citizenship status of thousands of voters.

Secretary of State Kent Detzner wants the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to let Florida have access to an immigration database maintained by the federal government.

"I hope you will understand the importance of making sure the vote of an eligible voter is not diminished by the vote of ineligible voter and provide my department the access it needs," Detzner wrote to Secretary Janet Napolitano.

A Department of Homeland Security official said Thursday that the federal agency is aware of Florida's request but that there a "number of legal and operational challenges" to granting the state access.

Detzner in his letter said that while Florida's initial list was "credible and reliable" he acknowledged that his department's ability to "validate a person's legal status as up to date was limited." The first list was drawn by comparing driver's licenses to voter registration lists. The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles initially planned to double-check its information with the federal database but has since been told that is not permitted.

Even without access to the federal database Cate had said the state is likely to circulate additional names to election supervisors in the weeks ahead.

But some election supervisors are already saying that they will ignore any additional names given to them by the Florida Department of State.

"It's illegal under federal law and I'm going to follow the law," said Leon County Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/01/feds-order-florida-to-halt-ongoing-push-to-remove-thousands-voters-from-rolls/#ixzz1wY3GGrq8