Thursday, February 28, 2013

Obama: Leadership Through Intimidation


Economic Armageddon? Republicans call sequester warnings hype




First there was the debt-ceiling crisis. Then the "fiscal cliff." Now it's the "sequester." 

While Congress averted the first two crises, it looks like lawmakers do not have a way out of the automatic spending cuts poised to hit Friday -- at least not yet. 

But are they really as bad as the Obama administration says? 

Republican lawmakers, while acknowledging the whole situation is far from ideal, have increasingly come to the conclusion that, no, they're not. 

"Most of the nation will wake up Friday morning and yawn," Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., said. 

Democratic officials have started to concede that the layoffs and other major effects from the sequester will not be felt for another month or so. "Nice of them to tell us now," an aide to House Speaker John Boehner quipped, in response to the recent assessments. 

Further, it turns out the dollars-and-cents impact this year is not nearly what officials have been claiming. While officials typically say the cuts this year add up to $85 billion, the Congressional Budget Office estimates actual spending will only fall by $44 billion this year. 

The $85 billion figure refers to "budget authority" -- or what the government can allocate this year, but actually spend over several years. 

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said Wednesday that the president is using the issue "to scare people in order to grow the size of government." 

Even using the $85 billion figure, the cuts amount to just more than 2 percent of the total federal budget. Administration officials say, considering where the cuts will actually hit, non-defense budgets will face a 9 percent cut, while the Pentagon will face a 13 percent cut. 

That's significant, but Republicans say the administration has -- or should be granted by Congress -- the authority to spread the cuts around in a way that is less damaging. 

"It's absurd to think that the government cannot get by with a little more than a 2 percent reduction in spending when every working American had to figure out how to make do with 2 percent less in their paychecks just last month," Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said Wednesday, referring to the recent expiration of a payroll tax cut for millions of Americans. 

In a glimmer of how officials might be considering less-damaging ways of cutting their budgets, Transportation Security Administration chief John Pistole testified at a House hearing Wednesday that his agency would look at implementing a hiring freeze and cutting back overtime before furloughing workers. 

The urgency, or lack thereof, can be underscored by the schedule of meetings. President Obama, returning from a trip to Virginia where he again pressured Republicans, has set up a meeting for Friday with the top four congressional leaders, in his first sitdown with Republicans this year. 

Considering the deadline is Thursday at midnight, one congressional Republican questioned why the president was waiting until the end of the week. 

"Either someone needs to buy the White House a calendar, or this is just a -- belated -- farce. They ought to at least pretend to try," the Republican told Fox News. 

Fresh polling suggests the country is not in a unified panic over the cuts. A survey by the Pew Research Center and USA Today showed only a quarter of people are closely following the issue, though most said the impact on the economy would be negative -- and most agreed that tax increases should be on the table as part of any compromise, which is what Obama has demanded. 

No matter how the cuts are implemented, the impact will be widespread. Roughly half will hit the Pentagon, which likely means furloughs for thousands of civilian workers and cutbacks elsewhere in the budget -- attracting the most attention has been a recent decision not to deploy an extra aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf. 

Practically every federal department has warned about the impact to their budgets, and to the public. The Department of Homeland Security has warned border security could be affected, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement has already started releasing illegal immigrants from local jails in Arizona while planning to monitor them. 

The Transportation Department says FAA cutbacks will mean delays at the nation's biggest airports. The National Air Traffic Controllers Association warned Wednesday that runways could close, causing more delays, at those airports. 
Further, unemployment checks are expected to drop by roughly 11 percent around the end of March. 

Furloughs, though, are generally about a month away, because federal law requires the government to give advance notice. At that point, many federal workers will have to take a day off work per week without pay. 

On the Senate floor, Democratic Leader Harry Reid said "these cuts will not take place in the next few days." 

"But they're going to start real quickly," he said. "So, within a matter of weeks we're going to feel these cuts and feel them really, really painfully." 

Democrats, though, are taking a risk -- betting that the cuts will be so painful and devastating that voters will rally to their side and pressure Republicans to accept a blend of tax hikes and spending cuts to replace the whole package. 
Senior administration officials said as much Tuesday, predicting Republicans would cave on taxes, just as they did toward the end of the fiscal-crisis fight. 

But House Republican leadership aides said that strategy is "wrong." 
Unlike in the fiscal-crisis debate, they claimed the current law favors Republicans "because if nothing happens, spending cuts kick in." 

McConnell reiterated Wednesday that he's "ready to work" with Democrats to pass a different package of cuts, but his office continued to reject Obama's call for new tax revenue through closing loopholes.

Border Town School District Promotes Sedition


American Student Punished for Refusing to Recite Mexican Pledge

American Student Punished for Refusing to Recite Mexican Pledge
Feb 27, 2013
A Texas high school student has filed a federal lawsuit against her school and her teachers after she was punished for refusing to salute and recite the Mexican pledge of allegiance.
The Thomas More Law Center filed the suit on behalf of Brenda Brinsdon alleging the McAllen Independent School District violated the 15-year-old girl’s constitutional rights when she was forced to recite the Mexican pledge and sing the Mexican national anthem.
Click here to read the lawsuit.
Brinsdon, who is the daughter of a Mexican immigrant and an American father, refused. She believed it was un-American to pledge a loyalty oath to another country.
Ironically, the school district has a policy that prohibits a school from compelling students to recite the American Pledge of Allegiance.
The district also has a written policy that excuses students from reciting text from the Declaration of Independence if the student “as determined by the district, has a conscientious objection to the recitation.”
“There is a sad trend in public schools across our nation to undermine American patriotism,” said Richard Thompson president of the Thomas More Law Center. “But it’s encouraging to see students like Brenda stand up for America despite pressure from school officials.”
The TMLC told Fox News the district ignored its own rules when Brinsdon refused to recite the pledge of a foreign country.
What’s most troubling is the different treatment for someone wanting to opt out of reciting the American Pledge of Allegiance compared to someone as a matter of conscience wants to opt out of reciting the Mexican pledge,” spokesman Erin Mersino told Fox News.
A spokesman for the McAllen Independent School District told Fox News they had not seen a copy of the lawsuit.
The recitation of the Mexican pledge and the singing of the Mexican national anthem was part of a 2011 Spanish class assignment at Achieve Early College High School.  The teacher, Reyna Santos, required all her students to participate in the lesson.
When Brinsdon refused to back down – she was punished, the lawsuit alleges. She was given an alternative assignment on the Independence of Mexico. The teacher gave her a failing grade – and then required the student to sit in class over a period of several days to listen to other students recite the Mexican flag.
The lawsuit states Brinsdon offered to recite the American pledge in Spanish but the teacher refused her request.
“It’s astonishing that this Texas school would deny Brenda her right of conscience and free speech not to pledge allegiance to a foreign country,” said Thompson. “Too many Americans – including those of Mexican descent – have suffered and died protecting our nation.”
And while she is fluent in Spanish and English and is proud of her Mexican heritage, Brinsdon is a “true-blooded American,” Mersino added.
Mersino said it was especially troubling to watch video of students in the class standing up, extending their arms straight out, palms down and reciting the pledge of a foreign country.
“It’s disturbing – it truly was troubling,” she said.

Welcome To Russia


VOTE TODAY ON FOUR GUN GRABS
INCLUDING FEINSTEIN'S S. 150!

BOTTLE UP THE GUN BILLS IN COMMITTEE

URGENT: The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, headed by none other than Vermont Democrat Sen. Patrick Leahy himself, votes TODAY on three blatant gun grabbing bills – S. 150, S. 54, S. 374 – and one 'feel good' spend your hard-earned dollars on a do-little interagency taskforce bill pretending to make our schools "safe" – S. 146!

To be more specific about what we're up against:
LEAHY'S S. 54 WILL BAN ALL PRIVATE SALES, 'NECESSITATE' GUN LICENSURE!
FEINSTEIN'S S. 150 WILL CONFISCATE 160+ "ASSAULT WEAPONS' MAKES AND MOST MAGAZINES!

SCHUMER'S S. 374 WILL MANDATE UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR EVERY FIREARM SALE OR TRANSFER!

WE CANNOT ALLOW THESE BILLS TO GET OUT OF COMMITTEE AND ONTO THE OBAMA-RIGGED SENATE FLOOR FOR A FULL VOTE! AS THE HAGEL SECDEF CONFIRMATION SO REVOLTINGLY REMINDED US, IN THE CLINCH WE CANNOT RELY UPON OUR SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVES TO STOP THE SELL OUT OF OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS!

If we defeat Obama's gun grabbing in committee, we have him backed into a corner with too much political exposure to keep up an open fight. But if he can get these bills to the floor of the Senate and the House – look out! Obama's threats, intimidation and acts of coercion to get his way then can only be met by our resolve to impeach and the determination of our states to remain free…

Please, SELECT HERE to make your voice heard by the Senate Judiciary Committee and everyone else on Capitol Hill! And remember, it's not just the notorious Feinstein gun grab that must be stopped. Leahy's gun grab is every bit as dangerous to our rights and freedoms as LAW-ABIDING GUN-OWNING AMERICANS – and Schumer's help-along for a Big Brother national gun registry is not far behind!

EVERYONE has heard about the Feinstein "assault weapons" ban, but there is MORE gun control afoot that in its way is JUST AS BAD! Flying under the radar for weeks, Vermont Democrat Sen. Patrick Leahy's S. 54 gun ban bill introduced last month makes the mere planning of gifts and raffles of firearms punishable with 20 years in prison, and mandates universal gun licensure – and it is ALL SET TO PASS!
You see, the conniving S. 54 Stop Illegal Trafficking in Firearms Act of 2013, was cleverly and stealthily introduced while America at large was deliberately distracted with the odious Feinstein gun control flashbang.

Of these two bills, Leahy's S. 54 is supposedly the more politically 'acceptable' infringement upon our Second Amendment, meant to cripple us but protect incumbent Democrats up for re-election in 2014. It was designed to allow these anti-gun liberals to vote against the Feinstein ban yet vote for this cleverly crafted gun grab, which WILL empower the Obama Feds to accomplish what they really want – the disarmament of the American people. And this time, they aren't even pretending it's in the interest of public safety.

By now, you've probably seen the Gabby Giffords gun control commercials. As part of an emotional, manipulative P.R. maneuver, the unconstitutional infringement of our right to keep and bear arms is being billed as bandwagon 'common sense' when it is nothing but an elitist progressive plot. It is intended to keep each and every one of us at the mercy of fully ARMED Big Brother – legislation that will do NOTHING to keep firearms out of the hands of maniacs and criminals while doing everything to leave law-abiding citizens DEFENSELESS!

Gun Owners of America's Michael Hammond writes:
At its core, Section 3 would send a person to prison for 20 years if youATTEMPTED or PLANNED ("conspired") to buy a firearm as a gift for another person or to conduct a raffle of a firearm, and negligently failed to note that the gift recipient or the winner of the raffle was, for instance, a veteran with PTSD who had been placed by the Department of Veteran Affairsonto the NICS list.
Note that you don't have to actually transfer the firearm to go to prison for 20 years, nor do you have to know that the proposed recipient is a prohibited person. It is enough that you acted negligently, that you planned to gift or raffle the firearm, and that you engaged in one "overt act" necessary for conspiracy to take effect (e.g., getting in your car to drive to the gun shop).
In fact, the veteran or "prohibited person" doesn't even have to be on the NICS list and doesn't have to know they are a prohibited person. A marijuana smoker is a "user of … [a] controlled substance." If you buy a gun with the intention of gifting or raffling to one of those, you can go to prison for 20 years, be subject to draconian forfeiture provisions (933(a)), be prosecuted and sued under RICO (933(c)), and be prosecuted for money laundering (933(d)). In other words, unless you're "feeling lucky," the bill would effectively outlaw gifting and raffling firearms.
Finally, buying a gun for any other person – even though it's perfectly legal for him to own a gun – is illegal under all circumstances except for a gift or a raffle. Hence, if a person buys an AR-15 in another state where he has a vacation home (under 18 U.S.C. 922(b)(3)) and leaves it with a friend in that state for safekeeping – 20 years.

And then there is Section 5, which in our increasingly anti-gun and increasingly liberal judicial system could be used to PROHIBIT ANYONE FROM OWNING A FIREARM WITHOUT A LICENSE just by making a few edits!

Section 5 reads:
Section 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended…
(1) in paragraph (8), by striking 'or' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and inserting '; and
(3) by striking the matter following paragraph (9) and inserting the following:
(10) is prohibited by State or local law from possessing, receiving, selling, shipping, transporting, transferring, or otherwise disposing of the firearm or ammunition;
(11) intends to sell or otherwise dispose of the firearm or ammunition to a person described in any of paragraphs (1) through (10); or
(12) intends to sell or otherwise dispose of the firearm or ammunition in furtherance of a crime of violence or drug trafficking offense or to export the firearm or ammunition in violation of law.
This subsection shall not apply with respect to the sale or disposition of a firearm or ammunition to a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector who pursuant to subsection (b) of section 925 is not precluded from dealing in firearms or ammunition, or to a person who has been granted relief from disabilities pursuant to subsection (c) of section 925.

In other words, if you are prohibited by State or local law from possessing a firearm, you will also be banned by federal law and PLACED IN THE NICS system!

This WHOLE new front being waged on our Second Amendment rights is made the more laughable and ALARMING given the fact that Attorney General Eric Holder – ACCORDING TO THIS BILL – and all of his Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) underlings SHOULD BE IN PRISON FOR 20 YEARS for their FAST AND FURIOUS and FEARLESS DISTRIBUTING gun-running schemes!

But as we all know, the Lords – that would be the Obama Feds and his legion of bureaucrats – and the peasants – that would be US – are no longer bound to the same code of laws under the reign of King Obama.

That's why Harry Reid is so excited to pass through Leahy's Gun Control Plot, and Schumer's national gun registry primer – media obsession with the Feinstein Gun Grab was just all part of the distract and deflect strategy being put forth by this administration, and unless your elected officials HEAR YOUR OUTRAGE, FEDERAL GUN CONTROL WILL BE ENACTED WITH NO NEED FOR FEINSTEIN'S BILL!

In fact, Leahy's bill could very well incorporate its own version of the Feinstein gun and magazine ban that just as one bill will largely render the Second Amendment obsolete for private citizens!

It just depends on whether or not Obama's CAPITOL HILL minions think they can get away with it!

Fortunately, we have grounds to fight, even with weaklings like Mitch McConnell "leading" the GOP. ELEVEN Democratic senators are up for re-election in PRO-GUN states in 2014 putting the progressive chokehold in jeopardy, especially if they keep trying to jam through the notorious anti-gun Feinstein Bill. But with S. 54 on the table, they don't have to succeed with that bill… because they have their strategy laid out, and Harry Reid is a behind the scenes schemer with a MUCH better strategic team than McConnell.

Mark Begich (Alaska), Mark Pryor (Arkansas), Mark Udall (Colorado), Mary Landrieu (Louisiana), Al Franken (Minnesota), Max Baucus (Montana), Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire), Tom Udall (New Mexico), Kay Hagan (North Carolina), Tim Johnson (South Dakota), and Mark Warner (Virginia) are the Democrats whose re-elections hinge on not appearing to be anti-gun. That's why Harry Reid is going to let them vote AGAINST Feinstein's pride and joy "assault weapons ban" while turning around to vote FOR Leahy's "gun-trafficking" bill that STILL stealthily insinuates into law the national gun registry and licensure that will give the Feds control over our guns, and that the Feds have wanted all along anyways. For them, it's a win-win.

For us, it's no less than the inevitable obliteration of our CITIZEN gun rights, just as has unfolded in Great Britain, Canada and Australia – and no less effectively than if the high-drama, big-publicity Feinstein gun ban were to pass.

America, we didn't fall for one word of Obama's silly skeet-shooting "I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting" public relations lie, just as we didn't fall for the Feinstein gun grab veil in the name of 'public safety.'

But now we must fight Leahy's phony anti-gun trafficking bill AND Schumer's national gun registry bill, as well. And just like with the Feinstein farce, we will only win this on-going battle to preserve and protect our Second Amendment rights for present and future generations if we LOUDLY and INCESSANTLY demand our elected Members of Congress honor their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution of this country!

IF CONGRESS DOES NOT ANSWER OUR CALL TO ACTION AND BOTTLE UP THESE BILLS IN COMMITTEE, THESE FOUR DANGEROUS GUN CONTROL ACTS WILL PROCEED TO FULL FLOOR VOTES IN THE DEMOCRAT SENATE – WHERE ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN!

Already, Obama's gun-running accomplice Eric Holder IS IMPLEMENTING proposed regulation changes to begin enacting the illicit 23 Gun Control Executive Edicts his master Barack Obama issued! These will accomplish the following under the false mantle of 'public safety':
1. Grant local law enforcement agencies broad access to the gun sale database maintained by the FBI;
2. Allow law enforcement agencies to perform a NICS check BEFORE returning a confiscated, seized or otherwise recovered firearm to its owner;
3. Mandate the FBI keep ALL records of denied weapon sales in-house to "enhance the efficiency and operational capability of the NICS." The records will be kept indefinitely.
This data will be all ready and set for vast NICS integration, expansion and application new, broader UNCONSTITUTIONAL federal law, especially once Obama gets the Leahy legislation passed – unless WE STOP THEM! You better believe that the Feds are all sorts of 'interested' in who has a gun, and who is trying to buy a gun these days, and it's NOT the criminals they are worried about!

Think we are exaggerating? We have recently alerted you to Obama's most recent aggressive abuse of law-abiding citizens, persecuting former members of our military through the Department of Veterans Affairs with threats, intimidations and coercion in order to disarm our brave Veterans!

There is NO equity in the age of Obama under the law; we are no longer a nation of equality before the law. The Justice Department even tucked away special permission for Native American tribes to access NICS…

We MUST fight back before it is too late! While the gun prohibitionists try to sway the uninformed masses that We the People were only endowed with the Second Amendment to kill deer or turkeys or join Obama in his all-time favorite – SKEET SHOOTING – there is NO SPORTING OR HUNTING CAVEAT TO OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

Not on who may have a firearm, NOT on why we may have a firearm, and NOT on what firearm we may have!
NONE OF THESE GUN CONTROL LAWS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL! Remember, with Barack Obama's national campaigning and complete endorsement, Sen. Dianne Feinstein has now introduced her OUTRAGEOUS and FAILED "assault weapons" ban legislation in the U.S. Senate, and the elites of America act like this GROSS INFRINGEMENT upon our rights is permissible under our ordered liberty! IT IS NOT!

And even though unlike the ObamaCare travesty, we are finding out the unconstitutional horrors contained within BEFORE Congress votes for it, it still is NOT looking good for us law-abiding gun owners if those we have entrusted with office in Washington CANNOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CONSTITUTIONAL AND AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!

In 1995, Feinstein justified her core belief in national disarmament of the citizenry in the propagandistic promises of saving children and reducing crime, just as she is justifying her renewed attempts to pass an extremist, disgusting, draconian act of legislation AGAIN. THIS outrageous bill requires the re-registering of virtually ALL useful or market desirable firearms and the submission of our fingerprints just like those of sex offenders. Demagogue Diane Feinstein is apparently incapable of shame.

Surely at the suggestion of gun control posse leader Joe Biden and Dear Leader himself, Feinstein's war on firearms also includes a buy-back provision forcing gun owners to 'voluntarily' turn in their guns for a pittance or else have the government come into our homes and seize our firearms.

Accordingly, Senator Feinstein's bill includes measures to stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of:
  • 120 specifically-named firearms;
  • Other semiautomatic rifles, handguns or shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and has one or more military characteristic;
  • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
FURTHER, to promote the Obama anti-gun fear meme the left is assiduously constructing, Feinstein's bill extends the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban AND various state bans by:
  • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test;
  • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test; and
  • Banning firearms with "thumbhole stocks" and "bullet buttons" to addressattempts to "work around" prior bans.
It also bans average and large capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. Feinstein herself has admitted to the goal of regulating our handguns into non-existence for us commoners…
And then there is this – THE FEINSTEIN GUN GRAB BILL, IF PASSED, WILL NOT APPLY TO OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS– AND NEITHER WILL LEAHY'S VILE S. 54!
The laws these days are just for the little people!

MAKING THIS FIGHT MORE GRAVE STILL IS THAT LEAHY'S BILL IS CAREFULLY CRAFTED SO IT COULD EASILY BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE FEINSTEIN'S SECOND AMENDMENT HIT LIST THAT TARGETS WHICH GUNS AND WHICH CAPACITY OF MAGAZINES ARE BANNED FROM LOWLY PLEBEIAN OWNERSHIP!

All these Obama-Biden-Democrat maneuvers incorporating the the Feinstein-Leahy-Schumer-Boxer tag-team strategy and the bullying Obama 23 Executive Edicts are shameful, UNCONSTITUTIONAL 'infringements' on our God-given and lawfully guaranteed right to keep and bear arms as a free people… to violate the Second Amendment in this despotic manner comprises high crimes and misdemeanors and is grounds for impeachment.

If passed, the Feinstein disarmament bill will REQUIRE grandfathered weapons to be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
  • Background check of owner AND transferee;
  • Type and serial number of the firearm;
  • Identification, photograph AND fingerprint;
  • Certification from local law enforcement of that identity and compliance with state and local laws;
In the same spirit as Obama's $500 million Anti-Gun Executive Edicts, our broke progressive-controlled government is going to make sure one way or another – whether it's Feinstein's or Leahy's odious, unconstitutional legislation – gun control is PASSED.

Remember, our Second Amendment MUST BE SAVED from ALL of Capitol Hill's gun grabbing efforts AND Obama's Executive Actions – and WE CAN DO THIS, even with Barack Obama in the Oval Office – but ONLY IF WE FIGHT BACK!

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Terrorist Act Or 'Workplace Violence'?


DEMAND CONGRESS DECLARE FORT HOOD
SHOOTING A TERRORIST ACT NOW!

Help Support Reclassification for Victims and Families
Bring National Activism & Awareness to Their Cause!

Obama's Pentagon has had well over 3 years to do the right thing about Fort Hood. Unless American patriots start shouting, it will NEVER happen!
On November 5, 2009 Army Major Nidal Hasan opened fire on our soldiers at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas and it was declared by the Obama administration an act of 'workplace violence.'


When Hasan proceeded to yell "Allahu Akbar," it became evident without doubt an act of Islamist terrorism ON AMERICAN SOIL – the first since 9/11! When it was discovered he was personally advised by now-assassinated 9/11 plotter and treasonous enemy combatant Anwar al-Awlaki, and Hasan had distributed business cards with the acronym "SoA" or "Soldier of Allah" all claims of 'workplace violence' went up in smoke! Yet our military victims and their families are still being stonewalled by this arrogant, politics-determines-everything Obama administration!

While we all know that Barack Hussein Obama wouldn't publicly acknowledge a domestic act of jihad on his watch – not with an election down the road – but now the election is over and the 'anointed' one is still BLOCKING justice for the 14 MURDERED (including the unborn baby of one soldier who was pregnant) AND 32 WOUNDED VICTIMS!

Meanwhile, drone operators who remotely pilot the deadly craft fiddling with joysticks like gamers are now eligible for outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's shiny, new "Distinguished Warfare Medal" –the ninth highest ranking warfare award the Pentagon can bestow, above the Bronze Star and the Purple Heart and "earned" entirely from the rear for heroic efforts where the greatest risk is carpal tunnel or spilt coffee in their laps! By the way, these kids on the joysticks are ALSO earning Air Medals without ever deploying overseas!

BUT THE DEPLOYING FORT HOOD SOLDIERS WHO WERE SHOT BY A JIHADIST TO PREVENT THEM FROM REACHING THEIR OVERSEAS ASSIGNMENTS DON'T RATE AS COMBAT-RELATED CASUALTIES?
WE MUST HELP OUR FORT HOOD SOLDIERS AND THEIR FAMILIES!

Instead of honoring the SOLDIERS' lives lost, and supporting survivors of the shooting and their friends and family with needed combat benefits and recognition of their valor, the petty Campaigner-in-Chief Obama has chosen to ignore them in one of the ugliest political maneuvers of his remarkably selfish tenure in the Oval Office.

Obama appears to have issued a secret administration directive to prevent the Department of Defense from ever declaring the Fort Hood massacre of our soldiers by an Islamist traitor a terrorist attack as logical reasoning – if not HONOR – would otherwise compel DOD leadership to do so.

But it's not too late…

Casualties of the Fort Hood shooting – including Kimberley Munley, a State of The Union guest who unbeknownst to her at the time was used as a political prop by Barack Obama – are coming forward AGAIN to demand their rightful recognition and deserved benefits, and we are going to help them fight for it!

Obama exploited her as his stage prop because Kimberly Munley was one of two on-post police officers who bravely confronted Hassan as he yelled "Allahu Akbah" (or God is Great) before opening fire on our soldiers being processed for deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan
She shot Hasan once. She was shot three times.

Her partner, Sgt. Mark Todd fired the four bullets that brought self-proclaimed "Soldier of Allah" Nidal Hasan down.

Sgt. Todd was also used as a stage prop in Barack Obama's 2010 State of the Union address. And then they, and all their comrades in arms at Fort Hood, were discarded.

Not only did Barack Obama's political image makers manipulate the official "description" of the Fort Hood ATTACK to inoculate him again public relations damage for a horrible national security and defense breach, it was callously done without the slightest regard for what such a politicized and false designation of the "event" would mean for our assaulted men in women in uniform – WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN SAFE were it not for the Obama administration's deranged political correctness and coddling of Islamists.
Military news site Stars and Stripes reports that avoiding the terror-specific designation meant the victims and their families "do not get combat-related special compensation that provides disability pay."

"Basically, they're treating us like I was downtown and I got hit by a car," Army Staff Sgt. Shawn Manning told ABC News. He was shot six times by Hasan and two of the bullets remain in his leg and spine. Manning says the "workplace violence" designation has costs him nearly $70,000 in benefits if the massacre had been appropriately classified as "combat related."
"They (Fort Hood victims) were killed and wounded by a domestic enemy, somebody who was there that day to kill soldiers, to prevent them from deploying," said Manning in a video released this past October. "If that's not an act of war or an act of terrorism, I don't know what is."
These soldiers need our help.

Officialdom cannot get their story straight. Hasan's defense has all been hinging on his religious rights! His Muslim beard and his "right" not to shave has held up court proceedings for months. So are we dealing with Islamist fanaticism, or not?

And why so skittish? After all, the recent murderous rampage of disgraced and disgruntled former LAPD officer Chris Dorner was INSTANTLY labeled an act of TERRORISM – when in fact his revenge killings were directly related to 'workplace' complaints. Yet our soldiers are still without justice in gaining such a terrorism designation even AFTER extensive investigations following the attack revealed email exchanges between Hasan and Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born Yemeni radical cleric our DOD saw fit to kill by drone attack in 2011 AS A TERRORIST, FOR INCITING TERRORISM AND GUIDING AL QAEDA!

Still, the direct and documented al-Awlaki connection is not enough for Barack Obama to right this injustice to our honorable soldiers who were the victims of this TERROR ATTACK on domestic soil.

The FBI found in July of last summer that the Hasan and al-Awlaki email exchanges SHOULD have been handed over to the Pentagon, but say they believed at the time the information was too sensitive to share. The FBI argued in its report that visiting extremist websites is not grounds for action. And now, the DOD is hiding behind legal hogwash that changing the massacre's designation to a "terror attack" would hurt the on-going trial of Nidal Hasan for MURDER.

This is RUBBISH. Our military wounded and the families of the victims have been suffering FOR OVER THREE YEARS! All these bureaucratic excuses are NOT stopping us from demanding full intervention from our Members of Congress NOW!

Our wounded military and the families of the victims have suffered too long! Enough is enough! Obama's lapdog Pentagon MUST be overridden by Congressional directive!

This past fall, Reps. John Carter and Michael McCaul (R-TX) wrote a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Secretary of the Army John McHugh asked for the Purple Heart designation for our soldiers murdered or wounded by Hasan.

"Based on all the facts, it is inconceivable to us that the DoD and Army continue to label this attack, 'workplace violence' in spite of all the evidence that clearly proves the Fort Hood shooting was an act of terror," they wrote.

It is time for the administration to recognize the Fort Hood shooting for what it is – an act of terrorism," wrote Mccaul, the chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, wrote in a separate letter to colleagues that was co-signed by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA).

PLEASE HELP US DEMAND that the WHOLE Congress stand up with these few Members to buttress and if necessary ENFORCE our soldiers' fight for truth and justice! We MUST DELIVER OUR DEMAND to Capitol Hill to get behind our soldiers or get out of office!

Because right now, the Department of Defense is FIGHTING the injured and the families' lawsuit and Barack Obama is saying NOTHING about this PRE-MEDITATED MURDER OF OUR SOLDIERS IN THE NAME OF HOLY JIHAD. As Investors Business Daily points out, had Nidal Hasan gone AWOL and fled to Yemen to convene with his terrorist buddy al-Awlaki in person, would he have ended up on Barack Obama's oversight-free drone kill list?

AMERICA, OBAMA MUST NOT GET AWAY WITH BRUSHING THE FORT HOOD TERROR ATTACK OFF AS 'WORKPLACE VIOLENCE' WHILE THE ISLAMISTS EMBOLDENED BY NO MEANINGFUL CONDEMNATION SLOWLY TAKEOVER AT HOME AND ABROAD.

Defend our soldiers and defend our freedom by STOPPING the P.C. crisis wreaking havoc on our military might and national security! Stop this administration's Islamist-coddling lies that murderous Muslim killers shouting "Allahu Akbar" are NOT trying to exterminate and conquer us!


Thursday, February 21, 2013

Texas To Fed: Take Your Law And Shove It


Texas bill would block police from enforcing new federal gun laws



Under a measure advancing in the Texas Capitol, local police officers could be convicted of a crime for enforcing any new federal gun control laws.

Rep. Steve Toth, a newly elected Republican from the Woodlands, said his proposal would prevent officers from carrying out any future federal orders to confiscate assault rifles and ammunition magazines.

"There's a federal law, there's a 30-round magazine right in front of you - what do I do?" Toth said in an interview. The measure known as the Firearm Protection Act "answers that question in spades," he said. It moved Tuesday to the House Committee on Federalism.

President Barack Obama has proposed federal laws banning such weapons, but no such laws currently exist.

Toth's proposal would create a Class A misdemeanor for police officers enforcing any new federal gun regulations. It also would establish cause for the state attorney general to sue anyone who seeks to enforce new federal gun regulations. It is one of several states-rights measures being offered by conservative state lawmakers nationwide in response to federal gun control proposals.

Courts have long upheld the federal government's right to enact new laws, which generally supersede state law. Asked how legal precedent for the supremacy of federal law would affect enforcement of his bill, Toth said he expects a legal challenge.

"It may end up in the Supreme Court," he said.

Several recently elected lawmakers gathered at a news conference Tuesday with Toth and Richard Mack, a former Arizona sheriff who successfully contested implementation of certain provisions of the Brady gun laws in the 1990s.
"The federal government is not our boss," Mack said. "If there's any place that that's applicable and true, it's the state of Texas."

Referring to Greg Abbott, the attorney general who helped draft the bill, Mack added: "And we've got a great attorney."
Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Collin County and the most senior lawmaker who stood in support of the proposal, said it could become law "if it's not demagogued as an anti-Obama bill."

"This new group of freshman coming in, they're pretty bold," said Laubenberg, who is in her sixth term. "Pretty dynamic. Not just going to sit and let things happen."

Abbott's office confirmed its role in crafting the legislation but distanced itself from the criminal penalties it contains.
"The attorney general does not support a law that would provide any criminal penalties for police officers," said Daniel Hodge, Abbott's top assistant.