Our Fictional President

> Fact or Conspiracy?   Very Interesting.

> DECIDE FOR YOURSELF

> 1. Back in 1961 people of colour were called "Negroes". So

> why/how can the Obama 'Birth Certificate' state his Race as

> 'African' when the term wasn't coined or used at that

> time? 'African' is a Nationality, not a Race.

>  http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
>
> 2. The birth certificate that the White House released Lists

> Obama's birth  as August 4, 1961, and Barack Hussein Obama as his

> father.

>  

> No big deal, right?

> At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is

> aged 25   years old, and that he was born in " Kenya , East

> Africa ."  This wouldn't  seem like anything of concern, except

> for the fact that Kenya did not exist  until 1963.  Two whole

> years after Obama's birth and 27 years after his  father's birth.

> How could Obama's father have been born in a Country that  did

> not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was

> known as  the " British East Africa Protectorate".

>  

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya

>  

> 3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the

> listed place  of Obama's birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity &

> Gynaecological Hospital". This  cannot be possible, because the

> hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called

> "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home"

> respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity &

> Gynaecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals

> merged.  How  can this particular name of the hospital be on a

> Birth Certificate dated  1961 if the name did not come into use

> until 1978?

>  

> http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx

>  

> 4.  Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?   Perhaps

> a clue comes from Obama's book on his father.

> He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II.

> Unfortunately,  Barack Obama's "Birth Certificate" says his

> father was 25 years old (or 27  as the case might be above) in

> 1961 when he was born. That would have put  his father's date of

> birth at approximately 1936. Now we need a non-revised  history

> book; one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals,

> to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just

> how many  three-year-olds fight in wars? Even in the last stages

> of WW II, Obama's  father wouldn't have been more than nine years

> old!  Does that mean that  Mr. Obama is a liar, or that he simply

> chooses to alter facts to satisfy  his imagination, or for

> political purposes?

>  

> "Wedding ring is in for repair"

> Since when does a plain wedding band need repairs, along with

> your watch,  for  a whole month? Another piece falls into

> place.In a press conference last week Obama was not wearing his

> wedding ring, nor  was he wearing his  watch. When noticed, his

> staff said his ring was out  for repairs. No  reason was given

> for the missing watch. So is it just a

> coincidence that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewellery

> during the  month of  Ramadan? Surely it can't possibly be that,

> because although Obama  hasn't been to a Christian church service

> since entering the White House,  we know he's a committed

> Christian because he said so during his campaign!

>  

> This is the same president who spent the Christmas holidays in

> Hawaii to  avoid religious obligations as PRESIDENT at the White

> House. His children  do not receive Christmas presents either.

> Let's just face the facts and  quit trying to distort the truth.

> We have a Muslim for president in the  White House and he has no

> knowledge of American history.

A Collection Of Liars

The Obama administration are incredibly inept liars. Anyone following the time-line of events can easily pick out where their stories were changed, either to deny some event took place or to glorify a man who does not deserve it. See one small example below.

Re: POTUS Speech 9-10-13

... Others, like Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., praised the president’s performance.

"The president using the credible threat of American military action to bring diplomatic solutions back to the table demonstrates the strength of his leadership and his willingness to exhaust every remedy before the use of force,” she said. "As the Obama administration continues to pursue a diplomatic resolution, the president justly made clear tonight that the threat of military action remains on the table as we continue to work to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction, a pillar of our national security."

Obama did no such thing. In fact he did the opposite and bumbled into a workable solution thanks to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Everyone knows that, including Pelosi. How can the children of our country grow up with high moral standings when the actual leaders of our country so blatantly lie to cover up their inept attempts to cobble something together that resembles leadership.

Obama and his minions, in order to preserve their failing policies, are still refusing to release any facts concerning Fast and Furious gun running, Benghazi Stand Down Order, IRS stonewalling of Republican non-profit applications, and NSA domestic spying on American citizens, to name just a few.

At some point even the main stream media will realize that the party of jackasses is dragging them down the slippery slope and the protection Obama is afforded will dwindle. Please make it sooner rather than later.

World War III

Is there a law that says the President cannot admit a mistake, fix the mistake, and move on to the next thing? Does the law say that when he makes a mistake he must deny the mistake, cover up the mistake, and get his people to research ways to make the mistake disappear? What is the point of all that? It is ridiculous to think he can do all that and somehow save face. He is making it all worse, much worse.

Obama Care is a mistake as costs are escalating daily, Fast and Furious was a mistake in providing weapons to drug cartels, IRS stonewalling non-profit Republicans was a mistake as it is illegal, covering up NSA spying on citizens is a mistake, obfuscating details of Benghazi is a mistake, and his bluff in drawing a red line in Syria was a huge mistake. We now have enemy warships lined up against us because of that. Hiding the facts and shifting the blame again and again will not fix anything, and will make it much worse.

 Thanks to Mr. Obama the world views us as ineffectual, unimportant, and stupid. They have no respect for us whatsoever. One of our most stupid actions is to bequeath billions to our enemies (who vow to someday destroy us) in hopes we can somehow buy their affection. They simply view us as fools because of that, and rightly so. We are actively helping them buy more weapons with which to accomplish their goals.

Many of us are growing weary of him using his charisma to blow smoke in order to institute plans which are destructive to our economy and our freedoms. He has done it so often it is now obvious when another fiasco is on it's way. Sadly there are many objectives initiated by him that will unfold ever so slowly over many years, if we live that long. 

As I write this the Russians, Chinese, and Iranians have warships steaming toward our location in the Mediterranean. This may be the final 'mistake' as there is gathering evidence the gas attacks were by the rebels, not the regime, as Obama has insisted. Sending rockets, under false pretenses, into Syria could easily trigger World War III.

Dear Barack

Dear Barack    By Mychal Massie

This is intended to be an open letter to you, Barack Obama. I will dispense with the usual salutatory “Dear Mr. blah blah” because to address you as same would mean that I accept you as my president, which I cannot and do not. I know that my words will offend those for whom the color of your skin means more than the quality of your job performance. But I place a high premium on the performance of the man who occupies the position you do. A performance that is based on leadership, loyalty to America and adherence to the Constitution of The United States. I view you, in the absence of any of those qualities, as a seat-holder for an American leader who embodies those qualities, and who has respect for We the People of this great nation, which you are doing your best to defile.

Barack, many Americans wanted to see you do well not because they accepted your leadership and vision for America because they did not. They wanted you to do well because you are the first person of color to occupy the most powerful office in the world. I suffered under no such illusions.

I knew that any person who would viciously fight against saving children who had survived an attempted abortion, arguing defacto, as you did, that these children who were outside the womb and capable of surviving must not be provided care to keep them alive could not be trusted to act in the best interest of our nation. You can reread my syndicated column “Darth Democrat” (WND.com; 11/16/04). You remember that one I’m sure. You certainly should after the response it evoked from you.

The legislation you savagely fought to defeat in Chicago would have sentenced Sarah Smith, Dr. Imre Teglasy, Heidi Huffman, Josiah Presley, and Gianna Jessen as well as many other children who survived despite attempts to murder them by abortion.

Barack, President Kennedy was driven to relationships outside of his marriage. By any reasonable definition of the word addicted, he was addicted to prescription pain pills for the chronic back and related pain he suffered every hour of his life in the White House. And it is documented that it was the dead people voting en masse that enabled him to defeat Richard Nixon for the Presidency. But he loved America. He served his country in the military, and he suffered life-altering injury. You’re nothing like he was.

Lyndon Johnson was as bigoted as they came, but he reached out to Republicans to pass legislation (the Civil Rights Act) to end social injustice. Bill Clinton was a serial philanderer and physically abused women, but any condemnation afforded him pales in comparison to that which is due you. Even Jimmy Carter, a southerner who often referred to how well his “mamma took care of the nigras that worked for them,” didn’t foment racial discord.

In the history of The United States, no president has worked as systematically to enrage racial tensions between Americans as you have. I know that you would disagree publicly, and that those who worship the color of your skin will either disagree or say, "so what."

Barack, your legacy could have been not only that you ended racial problems in this country, but also you had it within your power to diminish racial strife worldwide. Instead, you have shamelessly exacerbated and fomented racial discord in America and, I argue, by default around the world.

You are quick to malign and undermine the authority of police, specifically the Cambridge police, whom you publicly called “stupid” when, in fact, they were doing their job to make sure of the safety of Professor Gates.

You have given your tacit support fully aware that your Attorney General, Eric Holder, issued an edict within the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, whereby he refuses to prosecute any civil rights cases in which the victim and/or aggrieved is not black.

You interjected yourself into the Trayvon Martin situation but have been silent in the aftermath of the vicious murder of Christopher Lane, the 22-year old East Central University baseball player in southern Oklahoma. The media and district attorney are claiming the murder wasn’t racially motivated, but you know full well that had three white teens murdered a black person, the assessment would be different.

World War II veteran, Delbert “Shorty” Belton, aged 88, in Spokane, Washington was brutally beaten to death and robbed by black teenagers, and you have had nothing to say. And we cannot help but notice that you had nothing to say about the police officer who suffered a fractured skull at the hands of blacks as he was trying to rescue a woman being assaulted. Perhaps you thought he was “stupid,” too?

The silence coming from you is deafening pursuant to (the black) teenager De’Marquise Elkins who is accused of shooting 13-month old Antonio Santiago in the face, resulting in the baby’s death during a robbery attempt of the baby’s mother.

You have had nothing to say about the 10,000-plus blacks murdered by other blacks from the day George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin in self-defense to the day George Zimmerman was found not guilty of all charges. How silent would you have been if whites had murdered 10 blacks?

You have offered no condemnation of the horrific threats and taunts by the New Black Panthers, which included raising money across state lines for the purpose of offering a reward for the murder of George Zimmerman and calling for white babies to be killed.

President Eisenhower sent National Guard to insure Arkansas schools were integrated. You sat silent and allowed your Justice Department to refuse to prosecute New Black Panther members for intimidating white voters in Philadelphia, PA.

You have had the opportunity to lead America away from the aberrant behavior and animus by many blacks as well as, for all intents and purposes, to retire racial discord to the ash heaps of American history. Instead, you have worked to fertilize and promote racial animus and hostility toward whites by blacks.

A leader wouldn’t do that. Not even the past presidents from your own party – a party whose history is steeped in racial prejudice – have contributed to racial discord as you have. It would be nice if I could wish you well, but, as it is, I can only wish you were gone.

Just My Opinion

I have been watching developments in the middle east for many years. In all these years not a thing has changed. There has been no improvement to anyone's life there, only more misery.

The middle east is the home of at least a dozen Islamic factions, each vowing to kill the other and willing to die while killing them. They delight in killing their neighbors simply to spread their version of Islam in Allah's name. They lay waste to entire regions and blame others for not improving their miserable lives.

Currently there are no less than 7 battles, large and small, occurring there. This has been going on for centuries, so long it has become genetic. Muslims are compelled and taught to kill from birth. They are compelled to kill not just Infidels but other Muslims as well. They use fake cease-fires and 'peace talks' again and again to gain time to re-arm and start the killing all over again.

The groups, factions, and nations in the middle east are constantly switching sides to suit their current whims. There is no logic to it and no real desire to change anything. When they run out of people to kill in one area they simply migrate to the next and start all over again.

My question is why do we bother to interfere with them? It is a gross, unjustified waste of our tax dollars to pretend to try to bring peace in the middle east. It will never happen, ever. Why not let them sort out their own differences. After all, when they are killing each other they are not killing us.

As I write this our President is pondering how to proceed in stopping the fighting, or at least the chemical warfare, in Syria. He has to choose between helping Hezbollah or the Muslim Brotherhood. We are well aware that both terrorist groups are our enemies vowing to kill us any way they can, so what is the point?

Islamic terrorists see any aid we offer as a sign of weakness and stupidity. Anything we do over there is going to cost a billion or two, and it will make absolutely no difference. Why not spend those billions in our own country, protecting our own borders and other real productive programs.

Obama Speech, 8-9-13

Obama Speech: 

If this was the first time I had ever heard him speak I would say, "Wow, what a guy". His sincerity and seeming benevolence is a winner. But, knowing him for these last 5 years warns me that he fits the description of the devil ... a glib likable man who says the things we all want to hear while acting in a directly opposite way.

If his policies and actions truly follow what he promises then why do we continue to go backwards? He is convincing, and watching him speak shows me why his followers are loyal and never question the obvious. We are not better off than when he was elected. We are worse off, as all reports have shown.

His description of Affordable Care sounds utopian and his disbelief that silly Republicans want to trash it is seemingly genuine. What he NEVER says about the plan is how it will be funded and how much it will actually cost the average individual. His only hint at that is to say that 'new products always roll out with some glitches'. Indeed they do.

He called on reporters to ask their pre-submitted questions and thereby avoided answering any embarrassing ones. He was able to prepare his smooth-as-silk replies before hand and recite them without stuttering. One reporter was rebuffed when he told her he 'will not answer policy questions'. Aren't they all somehow policy questions?