BLOOD ON OBAMA'S HANDS
STATE DEPARTMENT HIDING
OBAMA KNOWINGLY ARMED LIBYAN ISLAMISTS,
POSSIBLY THOSE RESPONSIBLE
POSSIBLY THOSE RESPONSIBLE
URGENT: Emerging information from Washington reveals that Obama knowingly armed Libyan Islamists with direct terror network ties – very likely those who killed our personnel in Benghazi!
Meanwhile, the State Department is firmly preventing Congress from meeting with any Americans who survived the Benghazi massacre and who may be able to reveal new information to investigators!
And now the Obama State Department is backing off the release of ANY report on Benghazi before next year, including scheduled testimony by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton!
Still, THREE months after the Benghazi massacre that left FOUR Americans dead, we only have more questions as the Oval Office continues stone-walling Congress to evade responsibility and the justice that the nation, and families of these four men, deserves!
"My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I'd like to visit with them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for me to know who those people are—or even how many there are," Rep. Chaffetz (R-UT) told Breitbart News in an interview on Wednesday. "I don't know who they are. I don't know where they live. I don't know what state they're from. I don't even know how many there are. It doesn't seem right to me."
"This is so patently different than any other experience I've had.Unfortunately, people have been killed and maimed and in harm's way in Afghanistan and Iraq and in points beyond. It's typically been the case that they would release those names but in this case, they won't. My challenge is to the media. You try and figure it out. They won't let Congress know. They won't seem to let the media know either."
This is NOT RIGHT, and we must get to the truth!
Approximately 32 Americans survived the Benghazi massacre and not one has been made available to Congress, or more telling, to the media – not even to Leftwing CNN or MSNBC for some staged, administration-favoring interview! This is UNHEARD of in this day and age where often just hours (if not minutes!) after a disaster involving Americans, there is a media frenzy to get all over it – and the reporters swarm until there is no stone unturned in their attempts to pump-up ratings!
Benghazi is different… and there's a reason.
It's not that the media doesn't want to touch this story despite Americans' thirst for information and for justice (could you imagine the ratings for a primetime exclusive interview with a Benghazi survivor?) No, it's much worse. They are NOT ALLOWED to touch this issue besides talking point hobnobbing and surface-level speculation. But even without the lapdog media actually doing real journalism, the truth is slowly leaking out of Washington one shocking fact at a time….
Since the 'consulate' attack, we have learned that it was actually a 'facility' – a mere 'mission' – the White House took special effort to clarify this aspect of the CIA talking points released to our U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice before her media talk show blitz. That dog-and-pony was to tsk-tsk America and trick us into thinking the attack was the result of spontaneous protest incited by an anti-Islam YouTube video, when everyone with a smidge of access in Washington or an ounce of common sense KNEW as soon as the attack happened that it was a PLANNED act of TERROR.
And then we learned what the 'mission' was – ARMING LIBYAN ISLAMISTS (including Ansar al-Sharia – the terror group responsible for the attack) and other anti-American extremists throughout the Middle East…
Last week, the New York Times of all sources released a scathing article confirming that Barack Obama continued covert arms shipments worth more than $200 million through Qatar and Saudi Arabia that were destined for Islamist militants in Libya and throughout the region AFTER the fall of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi. One militia that received U.S. weapons and funding via Qatar was controlled by Adel Hakim Belhaj, who was held by the CIA as a terrorist in 2004!
Barack Obama KNOWINGLY armed Libyan Islamists – possibly the same ones who KILLED OUR FOUR AMERICANS on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11 – through gun-running operations using Qatar and Saudi Arabia as the middlemen.
This all began in the spring of 2011 when Barack Obama took it upon himself to supply Libyan opposition – with known terror-group affiliations – $40M in military-grade weapons and funds to "secure" their government's arsenals. Barack Obama is as sneaky as they come. Thus, he used the "Arab Spring" opportunity to continue funneling weapons through Libya and other countries to Syria because he wanted to manipulate events in the Middle East. He is such a narcissist; he just cannot imagine things falling apart or going wrong under his watch. Too owned by his peace-loving liberal base to do anything above board in the war-stricken region, he just 'hoped' it would all work out…
But it didn't.
Barack Obama knew he was arming anti-America terrorists yet even as conditions deteriorated and his people there warned him and pleaded for prudence and more security, he kept sending MORE military-grade weapons, MORE ammunition and MORE money for the jihadist takeovers in the region!
Obama didn't want the political fallout from his peace-loving liberals and he especially did not want American forces engaged in yet another ground war in the Middle East, but he justhas to be theinstrument of 'change' in the region. So he armed proxies; he armed the terrorists – or the "insurgents" or "rebels" with known ties to terror groups like AL QAEDA – who are fighting against established regimes in the Middle East. And when it all went sideways he couldn't 'fess up,and he sacrificed Americans to keep his secrets.
Our guys DIED in Benghazi while this administration watched in real-time.
Obama and his administration ignored the warnings about arming terrorists just like he ignored the pleas for help coming from Benghazi before going to bed.
Benghazi is the proof that Barack Obama's foreign policy failure has come at a price higher than We the People are willing to pay. We must continue our fight to deliver the evidence of Obama's perfidy – the nation MUST learn the whole truth!
Right from the start, references to "Al Qaeda involvement" were stripped from the agency's original talking points.
Nobody is confessing to either making the changes or to knowing who is responsible for altering the intelligence memo sent out to multiple departments, including the State Department, National Security Council, Justice Department and White House. Mind you, these were the same talking points – the ones that originally referenced "Al Qaeda involvement" (or otherwise confirmed from the onset that Benghazi was a terror attack) used by U.N. Ambassador, Susan Rice when she went on her Sunday talk show gallivant to blame the YouTube video. The White House only admitted making the "consulate to mission-facility" edits, blaming the rest on "joint interagency efforts" in an effort to muddy the bloody trail of responsibility that in fact leads straight to Obama.
For weeks Barack Obama blamed a spontaneous protest for the Benghazi massacre as he paraded from one mainstream media outlet to another, and postured before the U.N. General Assembly. Is it really feasible that the President of the United States of America unwittingly was given watered down intelligence about the murder of four Americans, including our ambassador, on the anniversary of 9/11?
Shortly after the Benghazi massacre, Paula Broadwell – the mistress of former CIA Director David Petraeus – told her audience at a Colorado University book promotion that the real reason for the terror attacks was that the CIA Annex in Benghazi was a detention facility of sorts, where Libyan militia members were being held and that the attack was an attempt by the rebels to free them… but this story too was buried by the mainstream media.
The big, red flags get bigger and redder that the Obama administration is trying to cover all of its tracks. Broadwell knew too much from her pillow talk with Petraeus, but the media is happy to distract us with the tawdry affair rather than coverthe scandal of the massacre.
Experienced intelligence and security analysts have expressed deep skepticism of the official, conflicting accounts and the bizarre circumstances surrounding the Benghazi affair. Team Obama's cover up story crafted to conceal their criminal dereliction of duty in Benghazi is full of holes.
For example, numerous analysts and commentators note that on October 27 Petraeus, in contradiction to the official Obama administration account, emphatically denied that he or anyone else at the CIA refused assistance to the former Navy SEALs who requested it three times as terrorists attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on the night of September 11. The Weekly Standard and ABC News reported then that Petraeus's denial effectively implicated President Barack Obama in having refused vital aid to the valiant defenders, since a refusal to assist "would have been a presidential decision."
Following the lead, when Denver local reporter Kyle Clarke of KUSA-TV queried Obama directly as to whether the Americans in Benghazi were denied requests for aid, Obama dodged the question. But implied that he had known about the attacks as they were "happening."
Emails subsequently released revealed that the White House was informed almost immediately that a terror group had taken responsibility for the attack in Benghazi,and Fox News reported that the two slain defenders, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, had been refused in requests for assistance they had made from the CIA annex. Yet the Obama administration has continued to cover up and stonewall.
WHO DENIED THEIR PLEAS FOR HELP? IT HAD TO BE OBAMA HIMSELF!
AND THE TESTIMONIES OF PETRAEUS, CLAPPER AND MORELL ALL POINT TO OBAMA, AS WELL.
Charles Woods, father of Ty Woods, has called the White House's explanations of Benghazi a "pack of lies" and implied that those responsible for the decision in the Obama administration to refuse assistance are guilty of "murder." On a national interview, he added:
"My son violated his orders in order to protect the lives of at least 30 people. He risked his life to be a hero. I wish that the leadership in the White House had the same moral courage that my son displayed with his life."
State Department communications reveal that the Obama administration knew for weeks that the Benghazi Embassy was the target of an upcoming terrorist attack. The terrorists even performed multiple "dry run" mini-attacks on the compound in a presumed attempt to assess security breaches.
Obama TRIED to blame Benghazi on a movie. Then he tried to blame the massacre on lack of security by the State Department and the CIA.
But Hillary Clinton and General David Petraeus have refused to take the blame.
The CIA released an official statement weeks ago that the Obama administration's attempt to pin lack of security on the CIA was absolutely false.
It was Obama who refused to send in security.
State Department and CIA employees stationed in Benghazi begged Washington for increased security.
And sources close to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have claimed she DID order increased security for the threatened Embassy.
But Barack Obama REFUSED to send in the Rapid Reaction Force that could have saved Ambassador Stephens and the three other Americans killed in the attack.
Communiqués indicate that an American drone was sending live feed images to the State Department within 30 minutes of the initial attack.
Help was only 45 minutes away.
But again, Barack Obama refused to save our men.
Instead, it is being reported that as State Department officials watched in HORROR the 7 hour fire fight on live feed from satellites and drones, Barack Obama STILL refused to send help – and instead WENT TO BED.
Bing West, a former Assistant Secretary of Defense, told Greta Van Susteren that if Obama gave the order to secure the consulate in Benghazi as he has claimed – there would be a paper trail:
"If that actually happened the way President Obama said it happened, there's a paper trail and I think people reasonably enough can say, "Can we see the order?" because hundreds of others supposedly saw this order.
So far no one has offered any evidence that Obama made the order to protect our men on the ground in Benghazi the night of the attack.
Of the four killed during that 7 hour battle, 2 of our people died in the final hour, as their ammunition was depleted and relief forces FAILED TO ARRIVE.
Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL, was one of the last to perish. Sources on the ground indicate that Ty ran his weapon dry having killed 50 jihadists before he was taken down. The 30 people who escaped the Benghazi consulate with their lives, did so only because of the bravery of former Navy SEALs Ty Woods and Glen Doherty.
But if this administration had used the intel available and sent the help our men expected and deserved before their ammo was depleted, those two heroes would almost certainly still be alive.
THEIR BLOOD IS ON OBAMA'S HANDS.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said he has a report from a U.S. senator that at least two news networks have acquired emails from the White House explicitly ordering a counterterrorism team NOT to secure and render relief, but to stand down on a rescue mission at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
Speaker Gingrich stated, "If that's true… I think it raises enormous questions about the president's role, Tom Donilon, the National Security Adviser's role, the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, who has taken it on his own shoulders, that he said don't go. And I think that's very dubious, given that the president said he had instructions they are supposed to do everything they could to secure American personnel."
DON'T LET THIS COVER UP SUCCEED! SUBPOENAE PETRAEUS AND CLINTON!
Gingrich said "if accurate, it leaves two conclusions: that the secretary of defense usurped the Commander-in-Chief or that Obama in fact never gave the order he claims he did."
President Richard Nixon was driven from office and resigned in shame for far less dire derelictions of duty than the crimes of Barack Obama.
This is betrayal of the highest order. This is TREASON.
DON'T LET THIS COVER UP SUCCEED! DEMAND THAT CONGRESS INVESTIGATE!
SEE TO IT THAT CONGRESS CONVENE A SPECIAL COMMITTEE.
SEE TO IT THAT CONGRESS COMPEL A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW IN THIS SHAMEFUL TRAVESTY
DEMAND THE TRUTH!